Sponsored by

Comments on

Frustration over SB 1070 remains, Villaseñor defends TPD

Sunday's arrest of an illegal immigrant rekindled frustration over the enforcement of Arizona's SB1070. While protestors argued that Tucson police don't use discretion in calls to Border Patrol, the police chief said TPD calls half as often as it could.... Read more»

have your say   

6 comments on this story

1
1768 comments
Aug 12, 2014, 11:37 am
-1 +1

Meanwhile, members of the Group Protection Network Coalition — a confederation of the Southside Workers Center and other immigration rights activists in Tucson — learned about Prado’s situation and blasted out word that one of their members was in trouble. Soon around 100 people formed to protest the arrest.

OK, how did they learn about the situation so quickly? How did this Coalition get word out to 100 people so quickly? How did 100 people show up so quickly?

Two women, Sandra Garnica and Rachel Winch, crawled underneath the vehicle in an attempt to keep the Border Patrol agents from leaving with Prado.

The thought has occurred to me to organize my own protest that people like this aren’t arrested for obstruction of justice. This goes beyond “protesting”. This is blatantly interfering with a law enforcement officer being able to perform his/her duties. If this isn’t obstruction, I can’t imagine what is.

Prado did not have a driver’s license ...

I think there needs to be more emphasis on this part of the story. As I understand it you can be arrested for this regardless of your citizenship/legal status. Is that not correct? I have known people who have been arrested for this before, but that was years ago and the law might be different now, I don’t know.

If a US Citizen who can prove he is a citizen could be arrested under an identical set of circumstances, then these “activists” are only making complete asses of themselves.

2
1768 comments
Aug 12, 2014, 11:47 am
-1 +2

“During the custody transfer, two female U.S. Citizens interfered by lying beneath a Border Patrol vehicle after agents took possession of the subject. The two females were subsequently arrested by Border Patrol agents for obstruction after failing to respond to repeated warnings and refusing to move from underneath the vehicle.

My bad…I was commenting on the story a little at a time, and I was told that no arrests were made concerning Sunday’s incident. I am relieved to see that was incorrect, and embarrassed that I commented before I finished the story.

3
1768 comments
Aug 12, 2014, 11:54 am
-1 +2

anti-immigration law

“anti-illegal-immigration” law, please. SB1070 has never done, or ever proposed to do, one thing against anyone who immigrated legally, or was attempting to immigrate legally.

I’ll conclude my last comment on this story about offering a thought on Villasenor. I didn’t like his selection as Chief of Police. I always thought that the head of a law enforcement entity should reside within the community he is sworn to protect. I also don’t like his opinions about SB1070, and disagree with most of them. However, I do have to commend the guy on his professionalism. So far, it looks to me as if TPD is doing their job and enforcing the law as written, resisting the call from all the crybabies to do something less. I am pleasantly surprised by this, and hope it continues.

4
75 comments
Aug 12, 2014, 12:21 pm
-2 +3

“He still had the hospital bracelet from the birth of his daughter and I couldn’t let them just take my friend.”  - Who paid for the birth at the hospital?  The two women SHOULD have been charged with interfering with the work of a Federal Law Enforcement Officer.

I saw a white women in her 70’s at Monday’s protest say they only stopped him because he was brown.  If it were you or me we wouldn’t have been stopped.  Sorry Lady, but for the type of illegal turn this guy made, you and I would have been stopped for making it if seen by an officer and you and I would have had to pay the $300 plus fine as well.  This illegal alien not only won’t pay the fine, he probably didn’t have to pay a dime for the birth of his child either.

5
1768 comments
Aug 12, 2014, 12:26 pm
-1 +4

^^^I’m white, and I used to get pulled over all the time. So, that white woman in her 70’s is most likely senile.

I would be willing to hear out a part-of-town bias, though. With one exception at age 13, each time I have moved it has been further north. The further and further north I have moved, the less and less I have been pulled over. I really don’t think that’s coincidence.

6
318 comments
Aug 24, 2014, 7:01 am
-1 +1

so, If I am an illegal and just visited my new baby and had a new father bracelet , I shouldn’t have any consequence for driving poorly and being in the country illegally? Stop it please. Crawling under border patrol cars?

Sorry, we missed your input...

You must be logged in or register to comment

Click to enlarge

Paul Ingram/TucsonSentinel.com

Marco Galdino leads protestors in chants against the enforcement of Arizona's anti-immigration law in front of Tucson Police headquarters on Monday.

Categories

news, politics & government, border, crime & safety, family/life, local, arizona, breaking
Sponsored by

Top Commenters

  • Bret Linden: 1766
  • Dylan Smith: 540
  • Cactus Dave: 339
  • buddhaboy: 316
  • Roberto De Vido: 270
  • Brittanicus: 176
  • Quietwoman2: 172
  • EllieMae: 150
  • TucsonGirl: 116
  • janamg: 88
Sponsored by

Yes!

I want to help TucsonSentinel.com offer a real news alternative!

We're committed to making quality news accessible; we'll never set up a paywall or charge for our site. But we rely on your support to bring you independent news without the spin. Use our convenient PayPal/credit card donation form below or contact us at donate@tucsonsentinel.com today.

Subscribe and stretch your donation over time:

$10/mo. Printer's Devil
$15/mo. Cub Reporter
$20/mo. Stringer
$40/mo. Correspondent
$50/mo. Senior Correspondent
Enter your own monthly amount (number only)

Or give a secure one-time gift with PayPal or your credit card:

$5,000 Newshound
$2,500 Copy desk chief
$1,000 Trusted source
$500 Correspondent
$250 Stringer
$100 Cub reporter
$50 Printer's Devil
$25 Informed Source
$10 Dear Reader
Enter your own amount (below)

TucsonSentinel.com is an Arizona nonprofit organization fiscally sponsored by FCIR.org, a 501c3 charity. Your contribution is tax-deductible.

User Guidelines

Please be respectful and relevant. Thought-provoking. Or at least funny.

We want comments to advance the discussion and we need your help. Debate, disagree, yell (digitally) or laugh, but do it with respect.

We won't censor your comments if we don't agree with you; we want viewpoints from across the political spectrum. We're dedicated to sparking an open, active discussion. We believe people with differing opinions can spark debate and effect change.

Comments are open to registered users of TucsonSentinel.com.

Keep in mind:

  • A conversation involves sharing and respect. Support your viewpoint with facts, not attacks.
  • Ask questions. Search out answers.
  • Remember that being part of a community requires tolerance for differing views.
  • We can't ensure that all comments are based in truth. The only comments we endorse are those we write ourselves.

TucsonSentinel.com does not allow:

  • Hate speech. Blatantly racist, sexist or homophobic slurs or calls for violence against a particular type of person, etc. will be removed.
  • Obscenity & excessive cursing. Sometimes a well-placed curse word - if you're creative enough to get it past our auto-censor - can express your point in just the right way. But we say '%*$& no' to cursing for cursing's sake. And lose the explicit sexually-descriptive language. It doesn't contribute to the debate and there are plenty of other places on the Internet to find it.
  • Flaming. During a heated discussion, unkind words may be spoken. We can live with a certain amount of rudeness in the name of provocative conversation, but a pattern of personal attacks (name-calling, mocking, or baiting) is not acceptable nor are threatening or harassing comments. Show some respect, please.
  • Explicit political endorsements. As a nonprofit we can't allow electioneering. Analysis and explanation of political issues and candidates are encouraged, but specific calls to vote for or against a measure or politician should be done elsewhere.
  • Spam. Solicitation of products or services isn't allowed; contact us about advertising, we'd love to talk to you. Links to off-topic sites may be deleted.
  • Copyright or IP infringement. Lengthy quotes and violations of 'Fair Use' aren't allowed. Anything you post should be your own work.
  • Overposting. Don't bore people and waste electrons with identical comments on multiple stories or repetitive comments that don't advance a conversation.
  • Trolling, sockpuppetry, and other abusive behavior. Please don't feed the trolls and don't pretend to be someone you're not.
  • Gossip. Don't bring up others who can't defend themselves. We don't give out personal information; you shouldn't either.

Comments that violate these guidelines may be removed. We reserve the right to make up the rules as we go along.

Flagging

Commentors are solely responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. Users who violate these standards may lose their privileges on TucsonSentinel.com.

Sentinel editors can't read every comment. Trolls, spammers and other troublemakers can slide under the bridge. We rely on you to help maintain a healthy conversation - more than likely, you're reading these comments before the editors.

What if you see something inappropriate? Use the 'Flag' button to send it to a moderation queue. Help us out and tell us why you're reporting it; please don't report someone just because you disagree with them. Boy who cried wolf and all that. We'll take appropriate action on violations.

We will not edit comments to alter their meaning or censor comments because of political content.

We will not remove comments solely because they are heartless, cruel, coarse, foolish or just plain wrong. Your disapproval can maintain a decent signal to noise ratio. Ultimately, however, self-policing is the best method.

Bottom line, don't be a jerk.

Sign up for TucsonSentinel.com email newsletters!

find us on facebook
Sponsored by
Sponsored by
Sponsored by