Sponsored by

Comments on

Border 'safer than ever,' but Arizona still a crossing hot-spot

The U.S.-Mexico border is safer than it's ever been, but Arizona will continue to be the most-active stretch for border crossing as the "water balloon effect" squeezes desperate border crossers toward Yuma and Tucson, a new report says. ... Read more»

have your say   

7 comments on this story

1
179 comments
Aug 4, 2011, 2:17 pm
-2 +1

The Liberals talk about taxing the wealthy, which in my opinion they create the jobs in the real world. Tax, Tax, Tax, that seems to be the mantra of the Obama administration. But neither political party want to “deep six” the current tax system, that is unfair to the majority and gives huge loopholes to the few. Everybody understands they must pay taxes to run government, but that doesn’t mean any government that is overwhelming and taxing us into extinction. If there was a fair tax, no person who purchased any goods, mortgage, car or services of any kind could escape, not even the low income that pays nothing, even if it’s a few dollars, but collect from tax returns money-some fraudulently. The main point is why should we be severely taxed to pay for foreign nationals who steal into our country? Americans are ordered by the courts that we must accept them and financially support Illegal parents, children and extended family members?


This is forced on us, by the law called CHAIN MIGRATION. Millions have entered this way, and the sponsor unable to support them, so they are driven into poverty. CHAIN MIGRATION is an unfunded mandate, where taxpayers are placed with the burden of more welfare services.  This really started in 1986, when President Reagan signed a law that has crippled the American way of life, for the past twenty five years. The dollar cost has been unprecedented with millions pouring through our borders and saturating this country with cheap labor. While the nation has been transfixed by the recent debt ceiling debate, 22 million Americans have continued their search for a full-time job. Now that a compromise on the debt ceiling has been reached, Members of both parties are promising to get back to work creating jobs. Yet their promises are hard to believe allowing for both parties having refused to proceed on one of the most vital work-related problems, that of lowering yearly immigration levels.

The truth is Amnesties have never stopped, as records show that six small, but evident amnesties have been enacted quietly since 1986. This is not including a covert movement of handing out visas to one million and a half newcomers annually. The Judiciary Committee, under the Chairmanship of Rep. Lamar Smith (R-TX) has quickly moved on this action, to deal with the ongoing unemployment catastrophe. After three years of a Jobs Depression, we saw the first action by Congress to stop driving up unemployment by importing so many immigrant workers. A fortnight ago the Committee readied the bill, then forwarding to Congressman Bob Goodlatte’s (R-VA) the SAFE for America Act (H.R. 704) and going to the House floor. This bill would end the Visa Lottery and immediately provide some relief to America’s unemployed without costing American taxpayers anything. It would be a good beginning to conclude cutting back the incredulous annual immigration figures that have customarily run over a million a year.

2
179 comments
Aug 4, 2011, 2:21 pm
-3 +0

This is currently while 22 million Americans who want a full-time job can’t find one. Further to this, we must get behind those as voters and demand from our representatives both Federal and State to join sponsors of the E-Verify provision, which will mandate E-Verify across this country, and permanently obstruct illegal workers from stealing jobs from unemployed Americans.  The DREAM ACT is yet another controversial subject, as it’s tied to the parents who slip past border guards or come via aircraft, ignoring the immigration laws. The dream Act is itself, is not the main argument in this issue, but the consequences of bringing in other family members through CHAIN MIGRATION laws that adds even more people to our population. The state of California, has just past a Dream Act even though the state is running in red ink. Illinois, another high illegal immigration state, has just run passage of their own Dream Act. Although these are not Federally endorsed, this will however encourage more aliens to bring their children here for a free education.


Rep. Michele Bachmann, the TEA PARTY Caucus leader is a strong contender for president. Unlike the Democrats and the hidden torment of the Liberals or Republicans Bachmann will not tolerate the loose immigration enforcement, she will build the border fence according to its original design and enact harsh penalties for businesses that scorn E-Verify and still hire discount labor. Millions have come here following the rules according to the law, and wait there time patiently for many years. But those who cross our borders fly in with no intentions of ever returning to Europe, South America or Asia and then expect the American people to treat them with civility. If it wasn’t for the wilting economy of Arizona, no voices would have spoken up arguing the claim against the federal government had failed to enforce immigration law or protect each state from an invasion.

3
179 comments
Aug 4, 2011, 2:24 pm
-2 +0

This is yet another issue, that the TEA PARTY will conduct of returning agencies of the federal government, back to the empowerment of individual States—starting with education and the EPA is which is over regulating.  The TEA PARTY has become a massive grassroots movement of tens of millions of like-minded Americans from all racial and religious backgrounds and political parties. The TEA PARTY members share the nucleus principles of limited government, individual freedoms, personal responsibility, fair free markets and returning power to the States and the people. The TEA PARTY is about reforming all political parties and government, so the prime principles of our Constitution, once again, the foundation of which this nation stands.


The biggest lie ever concocted about illegal aliens is that there is a population of 12 million. That figure has been the official, an old tired statement of the Liberals and the open border zealots since 1987. The Undeniable fact is that there could be close to 40 million illegal’s aliens here, which have nearly bankrupted this sovereign nation. The authorities south of our border have admitted that 12% of their entire country now lives in the United States? One of the most tired banality of the immigration debate is that “immigrants do the jobs Americans won’t do.” With 22 million Americans out of work, this justification for not enforcing our immigration laws ring hollow than ever before.—There are an estimated 8 million illegal aliens in the workforce. Virtually all of them are in the unskilled sectors, which are stealing jobs from Black, White, Hispanic and others of different race groups

4
318 comments
Aug 4, 2011, 2:51 pm
-2 +0

safer than ever just doesn’t cut it .  I for one want our border states completely safe from foreign invaders that smuggle drugs, smuggle humans, and individually cross our borders illegally.  Safer than ever can change in an instant, and with more narco violence, killing. torture, beheadings. kidnappings in Mexico, the more mexican citizens might want to escape to the U.S. not just for jobs, but to stay alive. National guard, armed, every 50 miles along the border to protect our country. Common sense. Obama, Holder, Napalitano, do the job you were put in office for, and quit suing states that want to enact laws that would protect our citizens.

5
540 comments
Aug 4, 2011, 3:12 pm
-0 +2

@buddhaboy

It’s illegal for National Guardsmen under federal control to conduct policing operations. I doubt many state’s rights proponents would want the feds to have the ability to enforce martial law in that manner.

There are now nearly 10 times the number of Border Patrol agents as 20 years ago, while the number of illegal border crossers has fallen dramatically.. There are several BP agents per mile watching the U.S.-Mexican border. How would stationing the N.G. every 50 miles augment their efforts?

Guardsmen under state control are able to conduct policing duties. Thus far, the states - including Arizona - have been unwilling to pay for such operations.

6
318 comments
Aug 4, 2011, 5:40 pm
-0 +0

national guard is already on the border, we just need more.  Why wouldn’t more augment the border patrol? Your own news site documents very well the continuing drug trafficking, safe houses, stash houses, and drug abandonments in the desert. As the water baloon bubble squeezes more narco activity from San Diego and El Passo into Az, we should be prepared for future problems. Three BP agents permile watching the border? Not where I live & thats 3 miles from the border.Feds enforcing martial law? If it stops illegal human smuggling, drug smuggling, and illegal aliens, bring it on. National guard/ Guard the nation. Nothing else seems to be working, except no more jobs in U.S. for illegal border crossers.

7
318 comments
Aug 7, 2011, 6:56 am
-1 +0

National guard on the border is not “policing duties”.  They would simply be doing what they were designed to do, guard our country. The Merida Initiative has provided 1.4 Billion U.S. dollars to Mexico to try to stop the organized cartels that have made Mexico a narco terrorist hell for its citizens.Also millions of U.S. $ go to Mexico through the defense dept. Add to that the cost of prosecution of criminals illegally in our country. 80 % of all illegal drugs come via Mexico.  If there is possibly another 1.4 billion $  left, I for one believe that the Border can be more secure and more money, and troops can do that job.  Why wouldn’t anyone want to see this done. Have we become so desensitized to this problem? Or is it just a little too distasteful to admit .  SECURE BORDER. its not secure.

Sorry, we missed your input...

You must be logged in or register to comment

Click to enlarge

Center for American Progress

A new report predicts that sharp reductions in U.S.-Mexico border-crossing apprehensions, shown above, will continue as security is tightened on the border.

Categories

news, politics & government, border, crime & safety, local, arizona, nation/world, breaking, Cronkite News, mexico/latin america
Sponsored by

Top Commenters

  • Bret Linden: 1765
  • Dylan Smith: 538
  • Cactus Dave: 339
  • buddhaboy: 316
  • Roberto De Vido: 270
  • Brittanicus: 176
  • Quietwoman2: 172
  • EllieMae: 148
  • TucsonGirl: 116
  • janamg: 88
Sponsored by

Yes!

I want to help TucsonSentinel.com offer a real news alternative!

We're committed to making quality news accessible; we'll never set up a paywall or charge for our site. But we rely on your support to bring you independent news without the spin. Use our convenient PayPal/credit card donation form below or contact us at donate@tucsonsentinel.com today.

Subscribe and stretch your donation over time:

$10/mo. Printer's Devil
$15/mo. Cub Reporter
$20/mo. Stringer
$40/mo. Correspondent
$50/mo. Senior Correspondent
Enter your own monthly amount (number only)

Or give a secure one-time gift with PayPal or your credit card:

$5,000 Newshound
$2,500 Copy desk chief
$1,000 Trusted source
$500 Correspondent
$250 Stringer
$100 Cub reporter
$50 Printer's Devil
$25 Informed Source
$10 Dear Reader
Enter your own amount (below)

TucsonSentinel.com is an Arizona nonprofit organization fiscally sponsored by FCIR.org, a 501c3 charity. Your contribution is tax-deductible.

User Guidelines

Please be respectful and relevant. Thought-provoking. Or at least funny.

We want comments to advance the discussion and we need your help. Debate, disagree, yell (digitally) or laugh, but do it with respect.

We won't censor your comments if we don't agree with you; we want viewpoints from across the political spectrum. We're dedicated to sparking an open, active discussion. We believe people with differing opinions can spark debate and effect change.

Comments are open to registered users of TucsonSentinel.com.

Keep in mind:

  • A conversation involves sharing and respect. Support your viewpoint with facts, not attacks.
  • Ask questions. Search out answers.
  • Remember that being part of a community requires tolerance for differing views.
  • We can't ensure that all comments are based in truth. The only comments we endorse are those we write ourselves.

TucsonSentinel.com does not allow:

  • Hate speech. Blatantly racist, sexist or homophobic slurs or calls for violence against a particular type of person, etc. will be removed.
  • Obscenity & excessive cursing. Sometimes a well-placed curse word - if you're creative enough to get it past our auto-censor - can express your point in just the right way. But we say '%*$& no' to cursing for cursing's sake. And lose the explicit sexually-descriptive language. It doesn't contribute to the debate and there are plenty of other places on the Internet to find it.
  • Flaming. During a heated discussion, unkind words may be spoken. We can live with a certain amount of rudeness in the name of provocative conversation, but a pattern of personal attacks (name-calling, mocking, or baiting) is not acceptable nor are threatening or harassing comments. Show some respect, please.
  • Explicit political endorsements. As a nonprofit we can't allow electioneering. Analysis and explanation of political issues and candidates are encouraged, but specific calls to vote for or against a measure or politician should be done elsewhere.
  • Spam. Solicitation of products or services isn't allowed; contact us about advertising, we'd love to talk to you. Links to off-topic sites may be deleted.
  • Copyright or IP infringement. Lengthy quotes and violations of 'Fair Use' aren't allowed. Anything you post should be your own work.
  • Overposting. Don't bore people and waste electrons with identical comments on multiple stories or repetitive comments that don't advance a conversation.
  • Trolling, sockpuppetry, and other abusive behavior. Please don't feed the trolls and don't pretend to be someone you're not.
  • Gossip. Don't bring up others who can't defend themselves. We don't give out personal information; you shouldn't either.

Comments that violate these guidelines may be removed. We reserve the right to make up the rules as we go along.

Flagging

Commentors are solely responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. Users who violate these standards may lose their privileges on TucsonSentinel.com.

Sentinel editors can't read every comment. Trolls, spammers and other troublemakers can slide under the bridge. We rely on you to help maintain a healthy conversation - more than likely, you're reading these comments before the editors.

What if you see something inappropriate? Use the 'Flag' button to send it to a moderation queue. Help us out and tell us why you're reporting it; please don't report someone just because you disagree with them. Boy who cried wolf and all that. We'll take appropriate action on violations.

We will not edit comments to alter their meaning or censor comments because of political content.

We will not remove comments solely because they are heartless, cruel, coarse, foolish or just plain wrong. Your disapproval can maintain a decent signal to noise ratio. Ultimately, however, self-policing is the best method.

Bottom line, don't be a jerk.

Sign up for TucsonSentinel.com email newsletters!

find us on facebook
Sponsored by
Sponsored by
Sponsored by