Sponsored by

Comments on

After near-fatal collision, former Tucson-area firefighter is devoted to bike safety

Brendan Lyons ended up in the hospital after two bicycle crashes caused by distracted drivers — one of which fractured vertebrae and gave him a traumatic brain injury. Now, he runs a chapter of Look! Save a Life, a nonprofit that promotes biking safety and awareness among those behind the wheel.... Read more»

have your say   

3 comments on this story

1
5 comments
Jul 31, 2017, 3:36 pm
-0 +0

I expect more from Look! than victim blaming. Just look at Mr. Lyons. Hit twice by people turning, then from behind! He is expected to be psychic, and have eyes in the back of his head to live. Why does he feel the need to open with “It’s also the incompetence of the cyclist”??? One has to look no further than pedestrian fatalities in this city to start to question the narrative of reckless cyclists - if you don’t live in the foothills spandex crowd, you might start to notice that most of these “obnoxios” cyclists are average and low income citizens trying to get to WORK and getting killed for their lack of a car. Or coming home from the store (start noticing those shopping bags on the handlebars, people, you don’t cause they aren’t riding 5 at a time in the bike lane like on Skyline).

What we need is more seperated lanes and better crosswalks so you can bike without needing to ride on Speedway or Grant.

Glad I never donated to Look, they seem to be advocating half-solutions for the wrong citizens or giving cover to the “bad cyclist” narrative…I can’t imagine how you can do that after getting run down in the street 3 times! Maybe we should add therapy to the list of “fixes”...

https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2009/dec/15/cycling-bike-accidents-study
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/crashes-involving-bikes-mostly-drivers-fault-9s2ssx06vn9
http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/south-australia/four-in-every-five-crashes-between-cars-and-bicycles-caused-by-driver-of-car/news-story/dab0917b15a181f68c433e0eb74c8ab2?nk=ad87a36e81c841b82bada813112cb4c3-1501539598

2
4 comments
Jul 31, 2017, 8:00 pm
-0 +0

Helmets are not designed to, and do not, offer meaningful protection for anything other than a tumble off your bike at very slow speeds.  You get hit by a motorist from behind or crossing your path, you have a lot more to worry about.  Under some circumstances, the helmet can actually do harm by adding torque to the impact.

3
5 comments
Aug 1, 2017, 9:38 am
-0 +1

I didn’t mean to sound harsh. Clearly Mr. Lyons has donated countless hours in support of vulnerable road users.

But, I think given the time to do an interview and Mr. Arlia taking the time to write an article, there’s a lot more to be said on this subject than ‘hemlets and texting’. This leaves us with a bit of us vs. them posture, and never mentions any actual statistics or some of the other solutions like I noted.

It never mentions how rarely drivers are held accountable for the manslaughter of their fellow citizens either. Maybe a piece on the reticence of the justice system to treat this problem as more than just a constant stream of ‘innocent mistakes’ would be appropriate, for instance.

Sorry, we missed your input...

You must be logged in or register to comment

Click to enlarge

John Arlia/Cronkite News

Brendan Lyons shows off the remaining pieces of his bike and helmet, which he says saved his life in an October 2013 bicycle accident.

Categories

news, crime & safety, health, trans/growth, local, arizona, breaking, Cronkite News
Sponsored by

Top Commenters

  • Bret Linden: 1758
  • Dylan Smith: 521
  • Cactus Dave: 339
  • buddhaboy: 316
  • Roberto De Vido: 270
  • Brittanicus: 176
  • Quietwoman2: 172
  • EllieMae: 135
  • TucsonGirl: 116
  • janamg: 88
Sponsored by

Yes!

I want to help TucsonSentinel.com offer a real news alternative!

We're committed to making quality news accessible; we'll never set up a paywall or charge for our site. But we rely on your support to bring you independent news without the spin. Use our convenient PayPal/credit card donation form below or contact us at donate@tucsonsentinel.com today.

Donate securely with PayPal

$5,000 Newshound
$2,500 Copy desk chief
$1,000 Trusted source
$500 Correspondent
$250 Stringer
$100 Cub reporter
$50 Printer's Devil
$25 Informed Source
$10 Dear Reader
Enter your own amount (below)

OR: Subscribe and stretch your donation over time

$5/mo. Printer's Devil
$10/mo. Cub Reporter
$20/mo. Stringer
$40/mo. Correspondent
Enter your own monthly amount (number only)

TucsonSentinel.com is an Arizona nonprofit organization fiscally sponsored by FCIR.org, a 501c3 charity. Your contribution is tax-deductible.

User Guidelines

Please be respectful and relevant. Thought-provoking. Or at least funny.

We want comments to advance the discussion and we need your help. Debate, disagree, yell (digitally) or laugh, but do it with respect.

We won't censor your comments if we don't agree with you; we want viewpoints from across the political spectrum. We're dedicated to sparking an open, active discussion. We believe people with differing opinions can spark debate and effect change.

Comments are open to registered users of TucsonSentinel.com.

Keep in mind:

  • A conversation involves sharing and respect. Support your viewpoint with facts, not attacks.
  • Ask questions. Search out answers.
  • Remember that being part of a community requires tolerance for differing views.
  • We can't ensure that all comments are based in truth. The only comments we endorse are those we write ourselves.

TucsonSentinel.com does not allow:

  • Hate speech. Blatantly racist, sexist or homophobic slurs or calls for violence against a particular type of person, etc. will be removed.
  • Obscenity & excessive cursing. Sometimes a well-placed curse word - if you're creative enough to get it past our auto-censor - can express your point in just the right way. But we say '%*$& no' to cursing for cursing's sake. And lose the explicit sexually-descriptive language. It doesn't contribute to the debate and there are plenty of other places on the Internet to find it.
  • Flaming. During a heated discussion, unkind words may be spoken. We can live with a certain amount of rudeness in the name of provocative conversation, but a pattern of personal attacks (name-calling, mocking, or baiting) is not acceptable nor are threatening or harassing comments. Show some respect, please.
  • Explicit political endorsements. As a nonprofit we can't allow electioneering. Analysis and explanation of political issues and candidates are encouraged, but specific calls to vote for or against a measure or politician should be done elsewhere.
  • Spam. Solicitation of products or services isn't allowed; contact us about advertising, we'd love to talk to you. Links to off-topic sites may be deleted.
  • Copyright or IP infringement. Lengthy quotes and violations of 'Fair Use' aren't allowed. Anything you post should be your own work.
  • Overposting. Don't bore people and waste electrons with identical comments on multiple stories or repetitive comments that don't advance a conversation.
  • Trolling, sockpuppetry, and other abusive behavior. Please don't feed the trolls and don't pretend to be someone you're not.
  • Gossip. Don't bring up others who can't defend themselves. We don't give out personal information; you shouldn't either.

Comments that violate these guidelines may be removed. We reserve the right to make up the rules as we go along.

Flagging

Commentors are solely responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. Users who violate these standards may lose their privileges on TucsonSentinel.com.

Sentinel editors can't read every comment. Trolls, spammers and other troublemakers can slide under the bridge. We rely on you to help maintain a healthy conversation - more than likely, you're reading these comments before the editors.

What if you see something inappropriate? Use the 'Flag' button to send it to a moderation queue. Help us out and tell us why you're reporting it; please don't report someone just because you disagree with them. Boy who cried wolf and all that. We'll take appropriate action on violations.

We will not edit comments to alter their meaning or censor comments because of political content.

We will not remove comments solely because they are heartless, cruel, coarse, foolish or just plain wrong. Your disapproval can maintain a decent signal to noise ratio. Ultimately, however, self-policing is the best method.

Bottom line, don't be a jerk.

Sign up for TucsonSentinel.com email newsletters!

find us on facebook
Sponsored by
Sponsored by
Sponsored by