Sponsored by

Comments on

Paton poll shows dead heat with Giffords, but fundraising lags

Republican Jonathan Paton and U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords are in a statistical dead heat in the race for the CD8 congressional seat, a poll by Paton’s campaign says. But new fundraising numbers show Paton fighting an uphill battle to raise money.... Read more»

have your say   

3 comments on this story

1
5 comments
Jul 15, 2010, 1:36 pm
-1 +0

You mean an unabashed Republican huckster is in a dead heat with a fake Democratic huckster.

2
Jul 16, 2010, 11:24 am
-0 +1

Paton’s flimsy “poll” against Giffords shows he’s too afraid to release the results he got from polling primary voters. He obviously doesn’t have better numbers than Jesse Kelly, but likes to continue the storyline that he is the front runner. The fact that he has to tout a “poll” with a 5.8% margin of error is a joke – a distraction from the reality that all of us constitutional conservatives truly see. 

Paton’s fund raising numbers were abysmal compared to last quarter. He burned through all his Republican establishment donors and now has to release a “poll” to try to sell himself as a “candidate with a real shot” to conservatives.  This won’t work – we all see through his snake oil sales pitch.

It’s amateur hour over at the Paton campaign, even though his staff is full of high-paid consultants. If I was Scarpinato, I would be wondering why Paton’s fundraisers get paid so much more than him when they have nothing to show for it.

3
1 comments
Jul 16, 2010, 3:53 pm
-0 +1

One of the posts here talks about how Scarpinato should be mad at his fundraisers for making more money than him. Well, fundraising is the lifeblood of any campaign, but you have to have a staff proving to donors why they should contribute in the first place.

Paton’s fundraising team can’t help it if Scarpinato isn’t effectively communicating Paton’s conservative message. They also can’t help it if Scarpinato refuses to attack Jesse Kelly for his out-of-touch views.

Sorry, we missed your input...

You must be logged in or register to comment

Categories

Flags, news, politics & government, local, arizona, breaking
Sponsored by

Top Commenters

  • Bret Linden: 1153
  • Dylan Smith: 325
  • Roberto De Vido: 267
  • buddhaboy: 209
  • Quietwoman2: 172
  • Brittanicus: 143
  • Joan: 86
  • scar: 82
  • janamg: 72
  • azjimn2son: 63
Sponsored by

User Guidelines

Please be respectful and relevant. Thought-provoking. Or at least funny.

We want comments to advance the discussion and we need your help. Debate, disagree, yell (digitally) or laugh, but do it with respect.

We won't censor your comments if we don't agree with you; we want viewpoints from across the political spectrum. We're dedicated to sparking an open, active discussion. We believe people with differing opinions can spark debate and effect change.

Comments are open to registered users of TucsonSentinel.com.

Keep in mind:

  • A conversation involves sharing and respect. Support your viewpoint with facts, not attacks.
  • Ask questions. Search out answers.
  • Remember that being part of a community requires tolerance for differing views.
  • We can't ensure that all comments are based in truth. The only comments we endorse are those we write ourselves.

TucsonSentinel.com does not allow:

  • Hate speech. Blatantly racist, sexist or homophobic slurs or calls for violence against a particular type of person, etc. will be removed.
  • Obscenity & excessive cursing. Sometimes a well-placed curse word - if you're creative enough to get it past our auto-censor - can express your point in just the right way. But we say '%*$& no' to cursing for cursing's sake. And lose the explicit sexually-descriptive language. It doesn't contribute to the debate and there are plenty of other places on the Internet to find it.
  • Flaming. During a heated discussion, unkind words may be spoken. We can live with a certain amount of rudeness in the name of provocative conversation, but a pattern of personal attacks (name-calling, mocking, or baiting) is not acceptable nor are threatening or harassing comments. Show some respect, please.
  • Spam. Solicitation of products or services isn't allowed; contact us about advertising, we'd love to talk to you. Links to off-topic sites may be deleted.
  • Copyright or IP infringement. Lengthy quotes and violations of 'Fair Use' aren't allowed. Anything you post should be your own work.
  • Overposting. Don't bore people and waste electrons with identical comments on multiple stories or repetitive comments that don't advance a conversation.
  • Trolling, sockpuppetry, and other abusive behavior. Please don't feed the trolls and don't pretend to be someone you're not.
  • Gossip. Don't bring up others who can't defend themselves. We don't give out personal information; you shouldn't either.

Comments that violate these guidelines may be removed. We reserve the right to make up the rules as we go along.

Flagging

Commentors are solely responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. Users who violate these standards may lose their privileges on TucsonSentinel.com.

Sentinel editors can't read every comment. Trolls, spammers and other troublemakers can slide under the bridge. We rely on you to help maintain a healthy conversation - more than likely, you're reading these comments before the editors.

What if you see something inappropriate? Use the 'Flag' button to send it to a moderation queue. Help us out and tell us why you're reporting it; please don't report someone just because you disagree with them. Boy who cried wolf and all that. We'll take appropriate action on violations.

We will not edit comments to alter their meaning or censor comments because of political content.

We will not remove comments solely because they are heartless, cruel, coarse, foolish or just plain wrong. Your disapproval can maintain a decent signal to noise ratio. Ultimately, however, self-policing is the best method.

Bottom line, don't be a jerk.

  • A
  • A
  • A
  •   Share:
  • more»
Show previews