National Partnership for Women and Families
Most states, including Arizona, fared poorly in the eyes of the National Partnership for Women and Families, which ranked states on how well their laws support family leave for new parents.
Arizona got a grade of D for its legal protections for employees who need to take family or medical leave, in a recent national report ranking states on their health leave laws. But the state was in good company: The report gave grades of D or F to 34 states.... Read more»
National Partnership for Women and Families
Most states, including Arizona, fared poorly in the eyes of the National Partnership for Women and Families, which ranked states on how well their laws support family leave for new parents.
Please be respectful and relevant. Thought-provoking. Or at least funny.
We want comments to advance the discussion and we need your help. Debate, disagree, yell (digitally) or laugh, but do it with respect.
We won't censor your comments if we don't agree with you; we want viewpoints from across the political spectrum. We're dedicated to sparking an open, active discussion. We believe people with differing opinions can spark debate and effect change.
Comments are open to registered users of TucsonSentinel.com.
Keep in mind:
TucsonSentinel.com does not allow:
Comments that violate these guidelines may be removed. We reserve the right to make up the rules as we go along.
Commentors are solely responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. Users who violate these standards may lose their privileges on TucsonSentinel.com.
Sentinel editors can't read every comment. Trolls, spammers and other troublemakers can slide under the bridge. We rely on you to help maintain a healthy conversation - more than likely, you're reading these comments before the editors.
What if you see something inappropriate? Use the 'Flag' button to send it to a moderation queue. Help us out and tell us why you're reporting it; please don't report someone just because you disagree with them. Boy who cried wolf and all that. We'll take appropriate action on violations.
We will not edit comments to alter their meaning or censor comments because of political content.
We will not remove comments solely because they are heartless, cruel, coarse, foolish or just plain wrong. Your disapproval can maintain a decent signal to noise ratio. Ultimately, however, self-policing is the best method.
Bottom line, don't be a jerk.

1 comment on this story
I dunno if I agree with this…In late 2010 I suffered a very serious injury (outside of work) which required me to take what ended up being about four months off of work to heal and recover. It being my first long-term absence, I had no idea how it worked or what to expect. I found out that the situation was much better than I had originally envisioned, and I feel I was treated very fairly by my employer.
The only part that had me curious is that I was sent a letter stating that I was near the max hours that I could take for FMLA, and that I needed to return to work in order to keep my job. Didn’t bother me as I was ready (anxious is more like it) to return, anyway. The curiosity…the letter was sent to my office. How was I supposed to see it if I hadn’t already returned to work???