Sponsored by

Comments on

Feds sue Arizona over SB 1070

Updated with reactions & legal background: Saying SB 1070 “attempts to second guess federal policies,” the Justice Department filed a lawsuit Tuesday challenging the constitutionality of Arizona’s new anti-illegal immigration law. Read the brief.... Read more»

have your say   

4 comments on this story

1
4 comments
Jul 6, 2010, 12:09 pm
-2 +1

Now the State of Arizona will spend millions of dollars on defense of this law, not on border defense. Is this a surprise or the right way to spend the few tax dollars Arizona collects?

2
3 comments
Jul 6, 2010, 1:07 pm
-2 +1

Thank you, Thank you, Thank you Mr. President!!! When everybody else in the world thinks that Arizona is a terrible rogue state, making their own laws, which are against our Constitution, I am very proud of our President to protect the rights of us who live in this sate and firmly disagree with this new legislation.

This is a Governor who was NEVER ELECTED to office! With the backing of the ACLU and now the Federal Government (DOJ) filing a suit against this horrific law, I can feel better about staying in my home state, rather than moving away and doing nothing about it.

By the way, if Jan Brewer wouldn’t do such stupid things in the first place (this immigration law, filing a lawsuit against the Federal Government over the Health Reform Act, against our Attorney General’s advise) then we would not be spending money defending ourselves. When you break the law Jan Brewer, you face the consequences. The money spent on her decisions should be paid for by her personal assets and the Republican Party, not us taxpayers that have been 100 per cent against her breaking the law.

Mr. President, please take her DOWN! Stop this legislation and convince her that the “Majority Rules” with regards to the passing of the Health Care Reform Bill. We live in a Democracy, when more than 50 per cent of the people vote yes, it is the law!

3
1 comments
Jul 6, 2010, 11:31 pm
-2 +0

Majority does indeed rule, and we are coming!

4
3 comments
Jul 7, 2010, 1:59 am
-0 +0

Uhhh, if I’m not mistaken, we are already here. The health care reform act passed with a majority and the United States Constitution outlines that Federal Government supersedes any state law. So, who are these imaginary majority group of people coming from, Utah? Very odd. Even when Bush did not win the majority of the votes, we Americans followed the Supreme Court’s ruling. You didn’t see Gore filing substantiated law suits as he did not want to divide this country. Now he will be remembered as our very worst US President. Facts are facts.

Sorry, we missed your input...

You must be logged in or register to comment

Click to enlarge

Arasmus Photo/Flickr

An anti-1070 sign at an immigration rally in Washington, D.C., on May 2.

Categories

nation/world, news, politics & government, border, crime, local, arizona, breaking
Sponsored by

Top Commenters

  • Bret Linden: 608
  • Dylan Smith: 247
  • Roberto De Vido: 241
  • buddhaboy: 202
  • Quietwoman2: 172
  • Brittanicus: 141
  • Joan: 83
  • scar: 80
  • azjimn2son: 63
  • tiponeill: 38
Sponsored by

User Guidelines

Please be respectful and relevant. Thought-provoking. Or at least funny.

We want comments to advance the discussion and we need your help. Debate, disagree, yell (digitally) or laugh, but do it with respect.

We won't censor your comments if we don't agree with you; we want viewpoints from across the political spectrum. We're dedicated to sparking an open, active discussion. We believe people with differing opinions can spark debate and effect change.

Comments are open to registered users of TucsonSentinel.com.

Keep in mind:

  • A conversation involves sharing and respect. Support your viewpoint with facts, not attacks.
  • Ask questions. Search out answers.
  • Remember that being part of a community requires tolerance for differing views.
  • We can't ensure that all comments are based in truth. The only comments we endorse are those we write ourselves.

TucsonSentinel.com does not allow:

  • Hate speech. Blatantly racist, sexist or homophobic slurs or calls for violence against a particular type of person, etc. will be removed.
  • Obscenity & excessive cursing. Sometimes a well-placed curse word - if you're creative enough to get it past our auto-censor - can express your point in just the right way. But we say '%*$& no' to cursing for cursing's sake. And lose the explicit sexually-descriptive language. It doesn't contribute to the debate and there are plenty of other places on the Internet to find it.
  • Flaming. During a heated discussion, unkind words may be spoken. We can live with a certain amount of rudeness in the name of provocative conversation, but a pattern of personal attacks (name-calling, mocking, or baiting) is not acceptable nor are threatening or harassing comments. Show some respect, please.
  • Spam. Solicitation of products or services isn't allowed; contact us about advertising, we'd love to talk to you. Links to off-topic sites may be deleted.
  • Copyright or IP infringement. Lengthy quotes and violations of 'Fair Use' aren't allowed. Anything you post should be your own work.
  • Overposting. Don't bore people and waste electrons with identical comments on multiple stories or repetitive comments that don't advance a conversation.
  • Trolling, sockpuppetry, and other abusive behavior. Please don't feed the trolls and don't pretend to be someone you're not.
  • Gossip. Don't bring up others who can't defend themselves. We don't give out personal information; you shouldn't either.

Comments that violate these guidelines may be removed. We reserve the right to make up the rules as we go along.

Flagging

Commentors are solely responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. Users who violate these standards may lose their privileges on TucsonSentinel.com.

Sentinel editors can't read every comment. Trolls, spammers and other troublemakers can slide under the bridge. We rely on you to help maintain a healthy conversation - more than likely, you're reading these comments before the editors.

What if you see something inappropriate? Use the 'Flag' button to send it to a moderation queue. Help us out and tell us why you're reporting it; please don't report someone just because you disagree with them. Boy who cried wolf and all that. We'll take appropriate action on violations.

We will not edit comments to alter their meaning or censor comments because of political content.

We will not remove comments solely because they are heartless, cruel, coarse, foolish or just plain wrong. Your disapproval can maintain a decent signal to noise ratio. Ultimately, however, self-policing is the best method.

Bottom line, don't be a jerk.

  • A
  • A
  • A
  •   Share:
  • more»
Show previews