Sponsored by

Comments on

Holder held in contempt; Grijalva joins walkout, Barber splits votes

GOP members of the U.S. House, joined by a few Democrats, voted 255-67 on Thursday to hold AG Holder in criminal contempt of Congress in the investigation into Fast and Furious. Many Democrats walked out during the vote, including U.S. Rep. Raúl Grijalva. Ron Barber voted against it.... Read more»

have your say   

5 comments on this story

1
1158 comments
Jun 28, 2012, 3:15 pm
-1 +1

Meh, good. Anything that makes Grijalva leave the room is a very good thing. Maybe our whole country would be lucky and he won’t return.

As to Barber…so much for his perfect voting record.

2
29 comments
Jun 28, 2012, 3:45 pm
-0 +0

Argh.  Why would ANYONE want to be a politician these days?  I understand the Barber vote(even if I think Holder should be held in contempt in both cases)...I’m glad he stayed and voted his conscience instead of disrespecting the chamber and proceedings by leaving like others did.

You wonder where the schoolyard and Facebook bullies are coming from?  Look no further than the offspring of the “adults” commenting on political issues….

3
1158 comments
Jun 29, 2012, 8:42 am
-0 +0

I don’t understand the Barber vote. Well, check that, I DO understand it. He was doing as he was told. As I stated previously, Muffy Giffords in Burl Ives’ body. However, he did do the right thing in that he stayed to vote. Even if he did vote incorrectly, at least he didn’t disrespect us all by walking out.

I know the Tucson electorate is largely brain-dead, but a man can still dream…and I dream that Grijalva’s district will remember this, amongst a lot of other things, this November.

4
2 comments
Jul 2, 2012, 3:02 pm
-1 +0

As far as Ron Barber goes, his voting record speaks volumes….volumes of reasons why his days are limited.

http://downwithtyranny.blogspot.com/2012/07/ron-barber-has-already-proven-unworthy.html

5
1158 comments
Jul 2, 2012, 3:43 pm
-0 +0

@dbaron47

Do you really think the Tucson electorate is capable of doing the right thing by holding a politician accountable? Have you seen your City Council? Your Sheriff? The other Congressman? Barber and the Special election? Giffords before him? Braindead Bob three times? Three out of five of your County Board of Supervisors?

Of course Barber shouldn’t be in that spot. That’s abundantly clear to any reasonable thinking person. However, you saying that Barber’s days are numbered makes you look as out of touch with Tucson voters as Tucson voters are with reality. The electorate around here is beyond hopeless, and that’s why this community will never even come close to reaching it’s great potential.

This is horribly sad, and of course it shouldn’t be this way, but that’s reality. :(

Sorry, we missed your input...

You must be logged in or register to comment

Click to enlarge

European Parliament/Flickr

U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder

Categories

news, politics & government, border, crime, local, arizona, nation/world, breaking, mexico/latin america
Sponsored by

Top Commenters

  • Bret Linden: 1158
  • Dylan Smith: 327
  • Roberto De Vido: 267
  • buddhaboy: 209
  • Quietwoman2: 172
  • Brittanicus: 143
  • Joan: 86
  • scar: 82
  • janamg: 72
  • azjimn2son: 63
Sponsored by

User Guidelines

Please be respectful and relevant. Thought-provoking. Or at least funny.

We want comments to advance the discussion and we need your help. Debate, disagree, yell (digitally) or laugh, but do it with respect.

We won't censor your comments if we don't agree with you; we want viewpoints from across the political spectrum. We're dedicated to sparking an open, active discussion. We believe people with differing opinions can spark debate and effect change.

Comments are open to registered users of TucsonSentinel.com.

Keep in mind:

  • A conversation involves sharing and respect. Support your viewpoint with facts, not attacks.
  • Ask questions. Search out answers.
  • Remember that being part of a community requires tolerance for differing views.
  • We can't ensure that all comments are based in truth. The only comments we endorse are those we write ourselves.

TucsonSentinel.com does not allow:

  • Hate speech. Blatantly racist, sexist or homophobic slurs or calls for violence against a particular type of person, etc. will be removed.
  • Obscenity & excessive cursing. Sometimes a well-placed curse word - if you're creative enough to get it past our auto-censor - can express your point in just the right way. But we say '%*$& no' to cursing for cursing's sake. And lose the explicit sexually-descriptive language. It doesn't contribute to the debate and there are plenty of other places on the Internet to find it.
  • Flaming. During a heated discussion, unkind words may be spoken. We can live with a certain amount of rudeness in the name of provocative conversation, but a pattern of personal attacks (name-calling, mocking, or baiting) is not acceptable nor are threatening or harassing comments. Show some respect, please.
  • Spam. Solicitation of products or services isn't allowed; contact us about advertising, we'd love to talk to you. Links to off-topic sites may be deleted.
  • Copyright or IP infringement. Lengthy quotes and violations of 'Fair Use' aren't allowed. Anything you post should be your own work.
  • Overposting. Don't bore people and waste electrons with identical comments on multiple stories or repetitive comments that don't advance a conversation.
  • Trolling, sockpuppetry, and other abusive behavior. Please don't feed the trolls and don't pretend to be someone you're not.
  • Gossip. Don't bring up others who can't defend themselves. We don't give out personal information; you shouldn't either.

Comments that violate these guidelines may be removed. We reserve the right to make up the rules as we go along.

Flagging

Commentors are solely responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. Users who violate these standards may lose their privileges on TucsonSentinel.com.

Sentinel editors can't read every comment. Trolls, spammers and other troublemakers can slide under the bridge. We rely on you to help maintain a healthy conversation - more than likely, you're reading these comments before the editors.

What if you see something inappropriate? Use the 'Flag' button to send it to a moderation queue. Help us out and tell us why you're reporting it; please don't report someone just because you disagree with them. Boy who cried wolf and all that. We'll take appropriate action on violations.

We will not edit comments to alter their meaning or censor comments because of political content.

We will not remove comments solely because they are heartless, cruel, coarse, foolish or just plain wrong. Your disapproval can maintain a decent signal to noise ratio. Ultimately, however, self-policing is the best method.

Bottom line, don't be a jerk.

  • A
  • A
  • A
  •   Share:
  • more»
Show previews