Sponsored by

Comments on

Cunningham resignation suggested after alleged sexual comments

Sexual comments allegedly made by Councilman Paul Cunningham while on a junket in San Diego two weeks ago have sparked at least one colleague to suggest he consider resigning. City officials said no complaint has been filed, but Councilwoman Karin Uhlich said he should think about stepping down.... Read more»

have your say   

3 comments on this story

1
1153 comments
May 30, 2012, 6:28 am
-1 +2

Councilwoman Karin Uhlich said Tuesday that she called her fellow Democrat and told him that he should think about stepping down.

It’s her that should step down.

I’m not advocating what Cunningham allegedly did (and am still not 100% convinced that he did what was alleged…to the degree that it has been alleged anyway). However, the alleged incident appeared to be on off-hours in a social setting, and only involved a handful of people..

Uhlich, on the other hand, has for years been blatantly wasting the taxpayer dollars of roughly a million people, and doing all she can to embarrass this community and figuratively drive it off a cliff.

And ReHEEEEEEEEEna talking about “good behavior”? Don’t even get me started on that one.

So my point is that we have one guy who allegedly offended a handful of people being criticized by two others who have pretty much served to steal millions of dollars from hundreds of thousands of people. Considering all that, who does and does not have credibility here?

I will say to Karen and ReHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEna…you reap what you sow. This is what happens when you appoint an ass-kissing, rubber-stamp yes man as opposed to doing research and finding the best qualified person for the job. If you’re looking to place blame here, look in the mirror first.

Tell ya what Tucson mass media…get back to me when and if a complaint is actually filed. If there is not complaint, then all this is is rumors based on a few asshurt people. Let’s give this the attention it deserves.

2
37 comments
May 30, 2012, 8:32 am
-0 +1

Bunch of City of Tucson folks, on the taxpayer dime I assume, getting drunk in San Diego?  I don’t think I’ve seen any of these folks, drunk or otherwise, at any local pub, club or tavern. And besides…when will these idiots except the fact that no other city is like Tucson and thus,  “successful projects in the San Diego area” ain’t ever gonna be replicated in the same fashion in Tucson.

3
6 comments
May 30, 2012, 1:02 pm
-0 +0

If Cunningham were a Republican, the AZ Star would have explicitly printed out all the rumours.  Tucson’s City Council is comprised of six Democrats and one RINO.

Sorry, we missed your input...

You must be logged in or register to comment

Click to enlarge

Dylan Smith/TucsonSentinel.com

Cunningham in 2010.

Categories

news, politics & government, business, crime, family/life, local, arizona, breaking
Sponsored by

Top Commenters

  • Bret Linden: 1153
  • Dylan Smith: 325
  • Roberto De Vido: 267
  • buddhaboy: 209
  • Quietwoman2: 172
  • Brittanicus: 143
  • Joan: 86
  • scar: 82
  • janamg: 72
  • azjimn2son: 63
Sponsored by

User Guidelines

Please be respectful and relevant. Thought-provoking. Or at least funny.

We want comments to advance the discussion and we need your help. Debate, disagree, yell (digitally) or laugh, but do it with respect.

We won't censor your comments if we don't agree with you; we want viewpoints from across the political spectrum. We're dedicated to sparking an open, active discussion. We believe people with differing opinions can spark debate and effect change.

Comments are open to registered users of TucsonSentinel.com.

Keep in mind:

  • A conversation involves sharing and respect. Support your viewpoint with facts, not attacks.
  • Ask questions. Search out answers.
  • Remember that being part of a community requires tolerance for differing views.
  • We can't ensure that all comments are based in truth. The only comments we endorse are those we write ourselves.

TucsonSentinel.com does not allow:

  • Hate speech. Blatantly racist, sexist or homophobic slurs or calls for violence against a particular type of person, etc. will be removed.
  • Obscenity & excessive cursing. Sometimes a well-placed curse word - if you're creative enough to get it past our auto-censor - can express your point in just the right way. But we say '%*$& no' to cursing for cursing's sake. And lose the explicit sexually-descriptive language. It doesn't contribute to the debate and there are plenty of other places on the Internet to find it.
  • Flaming. During a heated discussion, unkind words may be spoken. We can live with a certain amount of rudeness in the name of provocative conversation, but a pattern of personal attacks (name-calling, mocking, or baiting) is not acceptable nor are threatening or harassing comments. Show some respect, please.
  • Spam. Solicitation of products or services isn't allowed; contact us about advertising, we'd love to talk to you. Links to off-topic sites may be deleted.
  • Copyright or IP infringement. Lengthy quotes and violations of 'Fair Use' aren't allowed. Anything you post should be your own work.
  • Overposting. Don't bore people and waste electrons with identical comments on multiple stories or repetitive comments that don't advance a conversation.
  • Trolling, sockpuppetry, and other abusive behavior. Please don't feed the trolls and don't pretend to be someone you're not.
  • Gossip. Don't bring up others who can't defend themselves. We don't give out personal information; you shouldn't either.

Comments that violate these guidelines may be removed. We reserve the right to make up the rules as we go along.

Flagging

Commentors are solely responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. Users who violate these standards may lose their privileges on TucsonSentinel.com.

Sentinel editors can't read every comment. Trolls, spammers and other troublemakers can slide under the bridge. We rely on you to help maintain a healthy conversation - more than likely, you're reading these comments before the editors.

What if you see something inappropriate? Use the 'Flag' button to send it to a moderation queue. Help us out and tell us why you're reporting it; please don't report someone just because you disagree with them. Boy who cried wolf and all that. We'll take appropriate action on violations.

We will not edit comments to alter their meaning or censor comments because of political content.

We will not remove comments solely because they are heartless, cruel, coarse, foolish or just plain wrong. Your disapproval can maintain a decent signal to noise ratio. Ultimately, however, self-policing is the best method.

Bottom line, don't be a jerk.

  • A
  • A
  • A
  •   Share:
  • more»
Show previews