Sponsored by

Comments on

Tens of thousands protest SB 1070 at Phoenix march

Tens of thousands of protesters marched on Arizona's State Capitol in Phoenix Saturday as they demonstrated against the state's controversial immigration law, SB 1070. (Updated with video)... Read more»

have your say   

6 comments on this story

1
7 comments
May 29, 2010, 4:47 pm
-1 +0

Some “social media” reports? What a dude’s tweet, or some chick’s iPhone update to Facebook? OK, so when the Tea Party march in D.C. last year had “social media” reports of “millions in attendance,” did you take those numbers seriously? In case you forgot, I’ll remind you that you didn’t. And for the record, I oppose SB 1070 for a variety of reasons, so I am sympathetic to the protesters, nonetheless, I am acutely aware of the bias at work here.

2
3 comments
May 30, 2010, 2:35 pm
-0 +1

There were between 40,000 and 50,000 peaceful people protesting SB1070 in Phx yesterday. I’ve attended numerous marches over the past 35+ years and was trained to estimate crowds. I was in place a few blocks from the capitol before the march arrived, and I stood there until the last police vehicle marked the end of the demonstrators. It took more than 2+ hours for everyone to pass by, and although there were times when there were some gaps (because of police allowing traffic to flow, I assume), most of the time people filled the entire street, from sidewalk to sidewalk. I think that the difference between the Associated Press estimate of 10,000 to 20,000 (ignoring possible political motivation) is that the reporter was at the beginning of the march and then jumped ahead to the final rally. With a march this long (5 miles) on a really warm day, many people didn’t march the whole thing, lots joined along the way, and there were thousands of people waiting at the capitol who didn’t march at all. It was a beautiful event, and it shows the commitment of those who think this law is wrong. No doubt—at least 40,000 and probably closer to 50,000 souls. Here’s to a more compassionate Arizona! lily

3
523 comments
May 30, 2010, 2:42 pm
-0 +1

Thanks for your take on the march, sweetlily.

Can you tell us a bit about the speakers? There wasn’t much coverage of the rally at the Capitol at all.

4
3 comments
May 30, 2010, 3:15 pm
-0 +1

@Dylan, Thanks for your interest and for the article. Unfortunately, I can’t be that helpful about the speakers because the rally at the Capitol started long before the march was over (which is quite common), and by the time I got to the Capitol, I just found a spot in the shade and watched the crowd and talked to people. So, I didn’t hear much from the stage except music.

One big problem in the media coverage so far is the assumption that most people who marched were Mexican. It seemed to me that most people who marched were American (yes, even the ones carrying the “Undocumented and Unafraid” posters), who understand that we will all have to prove our right to be here, since no one can tell who is a citizen just by looking at them (btw, I’m white-skinned and my ancestors are from Europe). The recent case in the Midwest where an American citizen of Puerto Rican descent was imprisoned for three days even AFTER he produced his birth certificate is horrifying. Supporters of this bill keep denying that this will lead to racial profiling, but I and many others think they are very wrong. The connection with white supremacist groups (including FAIR, which helped to draft this bill, and is on the Southern Poverty Law Center’s list of hate groups), the disgusting comments you can see on the blogs and websites, the supporters who proudly identify themselves as Nazis (including Sheriff Joe Arpaio, who said it was a compliment), and the fact that this tactic mimics southern Jim Crow laws that were designed to prevent eligible U.S. citizens from voting—all of that screams to me that some people are afraid of those who are different from them and will do anything possible to keep them down. This is sad, and I hope that the good people of AZ and the nation will say “No. This is not who we are as a people.” I also hope that you will keep digging, Dylan, because as a reporter you can educate people. Thanks. lily

5
3 comments
May 31, 2010, 2:22 am
-1 +2

It’s high time to get a handle on illegal immigration. SB 1070 is not about race but the rule of law.
However we need to hear your opinion at //link removed//

Cast your vote - each comment counts.

6
3 comments
May 31, 2010, 8:53 am
-1 +1

@greattt, When laws are unjust, it is our obligation as Americans to resist them (we are not 1930s Germans “just obeying orders”). This law is racist because it is part of the plan of white supremacists (which includes eliminating classes where students learn about all people’s contributions to our country). Here’s a link that gives information about Russell Pearce, who is SB1070’s sponsor, and his connections with self-proclaimed neo-Nazis (with pictures). http://crooksandliars.com/david-neiwert/profiling-arizona-legislator-russell. There’s a lot more out there, if you look for it. I find him and his buddies quite scary, and they don’t represent me or most other Arizonans. Thanks for your comment. lily

Sorry, we missed your input...

You must be logged in or register to comment

Click to enlarge

lazylightning/Flickr

Tens of thousands marched against SB 1070 on Saturday in Phoenix.

Categories

Flags, news, politics & government, border, local, arizona, breaking
Sponsored by

Top Commenters

  • Bret Linden: 1758
  • Dylan Smith: 521
  • Cactus Dave: 339
  • buddhaboy: 316
  • Roberto De Vido: 270
  • Brittanicus: 176
  • Quietwoman2: 172
  • EllieMae: 135
  • TucsonGirl: 116
  • janamg: 88
Sponsored by

Yes!

I want to help TucsonSentinel.com offer a real news alternative!

We're committed to making quality news accessible; we'll never set up a paywall or charge for our site. But we rely on your support to bring you independent news without the spin. Use our convenient PayPal/credit card donation form below or contact us at donate@tucsonsentinel.com today.

Donate securely with PayPal

$5,000 Newshound
$2,500 Copy desk chief
$1,000 Trusted source
$500 Correspondent
$250 Stringer
$100 Cub reporter
$50 Printer's Devil
$25 Informed Source
$10 Dear Reader
Enter your own amount (below)

OR: Subscribe and stretch your donation over time

$5/mo. Printer's Devil
$10/mo. Cub Reporter
$20/mo. Stringer
$40/mo. Correspondent
Enter your own monthly amount (number only)

TucsonSentinel.com is an Arizona nonprofit organization fiscally sponsored by FCIR.org, a 501c3 charity. Your contribution is tax-deductible.

User Guidelines

Please be respectful and relevant. Thought-provoking. Or at least funny.

We want comments to advance the discussion and we need your help. Debate, disagree, yell (digitally) or laugh, but do it with respect.

We won't censor your comments if we don't agree with you; we want viewpoints from across the political spectrum. We're dedicated to sparking an open, active discussion. We believe people with differing opinions can spark debate and effect change.

Comments are open to registered users of TucsonSentinel.com.

Keep in mind:

  • A conversation involves sharing and respect. Support your viewpoint with facts, not attacks.
  • Ask questions. Search out answers.
  • Remember that being part of a community requires tolerance for differing views.
  • We can't ensure that all comments are based in truth. The only comments we endorse are those we write ourselves.

TucsonSentinel.com does not allow:

  • Hate speech. Blatantly racist, sexist or homophobic slurs or calls for violence against a particular type of person, etc. will be removed.
  • Obscenity & excessive cursing. Sometimes a well-placed curse word - if you're creative enough to get it past our auto-censor - can express your point in just the right way. But we say '%*$& no' to cursing for cursing's sake. And lose the explicit sexually-descriptive language. It doesn't contribute to the debate and there are plenty of other places on the Internet to find it.
  • Flaming. During a heated discussion, unkind words may be spoken. We can live with a certain amount of rudeness in the name of provocative conversation, but a pattern of personal attacks (name-calling, mocking, or baiting) is not acceptable nor are threatening or harassing comments. Show some respect, please.
  • Explicit political endorsements. As a nonprofit we can't allow electioneering. Analysis and explanation of political issues and candidates are encouraged, but specific calls to vote for or against a measure or politician should be done elsewhere.
  • Spam. Solicitation of products or services isn't allowed; contact us about advertising, we'd love to talk to you. Links to off-topic sites may be deleted.
  • Copyright or IP infringement. Lengthy quotes and violations of 'Fair Use' aren't allowed. Anything you post should be your own work.
  • Overposting. Don't bore people and waste electrons with identical comments on multiple stories or repetitive comments that don't advance a conversation.
  • Trolling, sockpuppetry, and other abusive behavior. Please don't feed the trolls and don't pretend to be someone you're not.
  • Gossip. Don't bring up others who can't defend themselves. We don't give out personal information; you shouldn't either.

Comments that violate these guidelines may be removed. We reserve the right to make up the rules as we go along.

Flagging

Commentors are solely responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. Users who violate these standards may lose their privileges on TucsonSentinel.com.

Sentinel editors can't read every comment. Trolls, spammers and other troublemakers can slide under the bridge. We rely on you to help maintain a healthy conversation - more than likely, you're reading these comments before the editors.

What if you see something inappropriate? Use the 'Flag' button to send it to a moderation queue. Help us out and tell us why you're reporting it; please don't report someone just because you disagree with them. Boy who cried wolf and all that. We'll take appropriate action on violations.

We will not edit comments to alter their meaning or censor comments because of political content.

We will not remove comments solely because they are heartless, cruel, coarse, foolish or just plain wrong. Your disapproval can maintain a decent signal to noise ratio. Ultimately, however, self-policing is the best method.

Bottom line, don't be a jerk.

Sign up for TucsonSentinel.com email newsletters!

find us on facebook
Sponsored by
Sponsored by
Sponsored by