Sponsored by

Comments on

Barber, Kelly clash on character in CD8 debate

The debate between Democrat Ron Barber, Republican Jesse Kelly and Green Party candidate Charlie Manolakis broadcast Wednesday night might as well have been pre-scripted, in addition to being pre-taped. But it would’ve made for a good drinking game.... Read more»

have your say   

2 comments on this story

1
1158 comments
May 17, 2012, 7:55 am
-3 +3

Barber should not be criticizing anyone anywhere about character issues…

He started this campaign pledging to be “civil”, and pledging not to sling mud. Well, all of his TV spots I’ve seen broke that pledge. “Jesse Kelly would say anything to get elected”. Does that sound civil to you?

Barber’s whole campaign is the same bullshit that Muffy Giffords used to win…twist and distort Kelly’s comments about Social Security, use it to scare the seniors (read: biggest and apparently most gullible voting block), and watch the ignorance-based votes roll in on election day. Why change a winning strategy, right?

And, should Barber or any of Giffords former staff really be throwing rocks about someone living in Texas? Really?

I was willing to give Barber a chance, and I did. But, the more this campaign progresses the more the man disgusts me.

2
72 comments
May 24, 2012, 5:22 pm
-0 +0

Jesse Kelly would say anything to get elected.  Haven’t you followed his campaigns as he struggles to “refine” his message?  He wants to be a federal level politician more than anything else. 

Yet, he has taken little effort to prepare himself for the position.  He has held no political office and does not actively participate in any civic oganization.  He was an E5 noncom in the military…a first level leader with no policy making responsibility in a highly structured socialist society and he was infantry, not a speciality requiring serious critical thinking skills. (I’m a veteran with more years of service and a higher pay grade, I can damn well can evaluate his DD214). 

I did not vote for President Obama because i did not believe he was seasoned enough for the job.  That has been true.  He still has difficulties grasping the greed and cravenness of the other national leaders.  He is dismissive of good ideas that are not his.  And he needs to be clearer in pointing out stupidity, avarice, and racism.

I’m voting for Ron Barber.  And may reconsider Jesse Kelly some day when he gets some relevant experience.  We can elect him to town council or treasurer of VFW or something to start.

Sorry, we missed your input...

You must be logged in or register to comment

Click to enlarge

azpm.og

Barber, Kelly and Manolakis during Wednesday's debate.

Categories

news, politics & government, media & journalism, local, arizona, breaking
Sponsored by

Top Commenters

  • Bret Linden: 1158
  • Dylan Smith: 327
  • Roberto De Vido: 267
  • buddhaboy: 209
  • Quietwoman2: 172
  • Brittanicus: 143
  • Joan: 86
  • scar: 82
  • janamg: 72
  • azjimn2son: 63
Sponsored by

User Guidelines

Please be respectful and relevant. Thought-provoking. Or at least funny.

We want comments to advance the discussion and we need your help. Debate, disagree, yell (digitally) or laugh, but do it with respect.

We won't censor your comments if we don't agree with you; we want viewpoints from across the political spectrum. We're dedicated to sparking an open, active discussion. We believe people with differing opinions can spark debate and effect change.

Comments are open to registered users of TucsonSentinel.com.

Keep in mind:

  • A conversation involves sharing and respect. Support your viewpoint with facts, not attacks.
  • Ask questions. Search out answers.
  • Remember that being part of a community requires tolerance for differing views.
  • We can't ensure that all comments are based in truth. The only comments we endorse are those we write ourselves.

TucsonSentinel.com does not allow:

  • Hate speech. Blatantly racist, sexist or homophobic slurs or calls for violence against a particular type of person, etc. will be removed.
  • Obscenity & excessive cursing. Sometimes a well-placed curse word - if you're creative enough to get it past our auto-censor - can express your point in just the right way. But we say '%*$& no' to cursing for cursing's sake. And lose the explicit sexually-descriptive language. It doesn't contribute to the debate and there are plenty of other places on the Internet to find it.
  • Flaming. During a heated discussion, unkind words may be spoken. We can live with a certain amount of rudeness in the name of provocative conversation, but a pattern of personal attacks (name-calling, mocking, or baiting) is not acceptable nor are threatening or harassing comments. Show some respect, please.
  • Spam. Solicitation of products or services isn't allowed; contact us about advertising, we'd love to talk to you. Links to off-topic sites may be deleted.
  • Copyright or IP infringement. Lengthy quotes and violations of 'Fair Use' aren't allowed. Anything you post should be your own work.
  • Overposting. Don't bore people and waste electrons with identical comments on multiple stories or repetitive comments that don't advance a conversation.
  • Trolling, sockpuppetry, and other abusive behavior. Please don't feed the trolls and don't pretend to be someone you're not.
  • Gossip. Don't bring up others who can't defend themselves. We don't give out personal information; you shouldn't either.

Comments that violate these guidelines may be removed. We reserve the right to make up the rules as we go along.

Flagging

Commentors are solely responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. Users who violate these standards may lose their privileges on TucsonSentinel.com.

Sentinel editors can't read every comment. Trolls, spammers and other troublemakers can slide under the bridge. We rely on you to help maintain a healthy conversation - more than likely, you're reading these comments before the editors.

What if you see something inappropriate? Use the 'Flag' button to send it to a moderation queue. Help us out and tell us why you're reporting it; please don't report someone just because you disagree with them. Boy who cried wolf and all that. We'll take appropriate action on violations.

We will not edit comments to alter their meaning or censor comments because of political content.

We will not remove comments solely because they are heartless, cruel, coarse, foolish or just plain wrong. Your disapproval can maintain a decent signal to noise ratio. Ultimately, however, self-policing is the best method.

Bottom line, don't be a jerk.

  • A
  • A
  • A
  •   Share:
  • more»
Show previews