Sponsored by

Comments on

AG Horne, Pima Att'y LaWall to look into Babeu deportation allegations

Sheriff Paul Babeu called Tuesday for an investigation of allegations that he threatened to deport an ex-lover, and Babeu’s claims that the man committed crimes against him. Babeu asked AG Horne to investigate after Gila County authorities declined. The Pinal County attorney said he will refer the case to a statewide group of prosecutors.... Read more»

have your say   

3 comments on this story

1
607 comments
Feb 21, 2012, 4:44 pm
-7 +3

Thank you for giving us the complete name and city of residence for the elusive “Jose”. A photo of him would be awesome, as well.

I gotta tell you…this Jose guy has no credibility to me. He wants to start stirring shit, but yet he doesn’t even have the balls to man up and identify himself. Jose had to be “outed” by other people. Had Jose given his real name, shown his face, and said something to the effect of “this is me, this is what I’m saying, I’m not ashamed of it”, then I would have been willing to hear him out. But, because of the low road Jose chose to take, I see him as a bum who is looking for his 15 minutes, or a jilted lover taking his revenge, or someone looking for a payday like Mark Kelly, or maybe some other possibility I haven’t considered but it wouldn’t be pure.

2
28 comments
Feb 21, 2012, 5:25 pm
-5 +4

I totally agree, this Jose character is slandering Babeu’s name while simultaneously exploiting his sexual orientation.  Totally deplorable.
Babeu is right to call for a probe; as far as he is concerned, this guy was here legally anyway.  Jose’s accusations are actually able to be proven as fraudulent, if he is here legally.  What a dope.  Hopefully this fabrication doesn’t tarnish Babeu’s reputation as a diligent and admirable sheriff.  This coming from a Pinal County resident ;) @Bret Linden

3
Feb 21, 2012, 9:20 pm
-1 +4

DeRose has lied to reporters before in this matter, and has no claim to be believed now.  Babeu continues to lie about things that can be proven, and also forfeits any claim to be believed.  He has violated the bond of trust without which public officials cannot perform their duties.  If he has any honor or respect for his office, he’ll vacate it immediately.

Babeu accuses his ex-boyfriend of posting defamatory statements about him online.  Until he can be specific, the suspicion will linger that his offense was publishing true statements about him. 

The ex-boyfriend’s immigration status is irrelevant to the question of whether Babeu threatened to harm his family under color of law.  Why did Babeu mention the man’s brother in the threatening messages?

Babeu insists that there was no contractual relationship between his campaign and his ex-boyfriend, but DeRose accuses the man of violating his contractual obligations. 

Babeu’s campaign reports record no payments to the ex-boyfriend, but Babeu admits that he did receive some money.

Babeu says the relationship lasted about three years, but the dates he gives suggest it lasted longer.

Ten to one other people come forward with similar stories of being bullied by Babeu.

In the name of God, go!

Sorry, we missed your input...

You must be logged in or register to comment

Click to enlarge

Gage Skidmore/Flickr

Babeu in December.

Categories

news, politics & government, crime, local, arizona, breaking
Sponsored by

Top Commenters

  • Bret Linden: 607
  • Dylan Smith: 247
  • Roberto De Vido: 241
  • buddhaboy: 202
  • Quietwoman2: 172
  • Brittanicus: 141
  • Joan: 83
  • scar: 80
  • azjimn2son: 63
  • tiponeill: 38
Sponsored by

User Guidelines

Please be respectful and relevant. Thought-provoking. Or at least funny.

We want comments to advance the discussion and we need your help. Debate, disagree, yell (digitally) or laugh, but do it with respect.

We won't censor your comments if we don't agree with you; we want viewpoints from across the political spectrum. We're dedicated to sparking an open, active discussion. We believe people with differing opinions can spark debate and effect change.

Comments are open to registered users of TucsonSentinel.com.

Keep in mind:

  • A conversation involves sharing and respect. Support your viewpoint with facts, not attacks.
  • Ask questions. Search out answers.
  • Remember that being part of a community requires tolerance for differing views.
  • We can't ensure that all comments are based in truth. The only comments we endorse are those we write ourselves.

TucsonSentinel.com does not allow:

  • Hate speech. Blatantly racist, sexist or homophobic slurs or calls for violence against a particular type of person, etc. will be removed.
  • Obscenity & excessive cursing. Sometimes a well-placed curse word - if you're creative enough to get it past our auto-censor - can express your point in just the right way. But we say '%*$& no' to cursing for cursing's sake. And lose the explicit sexually-descriptive language. It doesn't contribute to the debate and there are plenty of other places on the Internet to find it.
  • Flaming. During a heated discussion, unkind words may be spoken. We can live with a certain amount of rudeness in the name of provocative conversation, but a pattern of personal attacks (name-calling, mocking, or baiting) is not acceptable nor are threatening or harassing comments. Show some respect, please.
  • Spam. Solicitation of products or services isn't allowed; contact us about advertising, we'd love to talk to you. Links to off-topic sites may be deleted.
  • Copyright or IP infringement. Lengthy quotes and violations of 'Fair Use' aren't allowed. Anything you post should be your own work.
  • Overposting. Don't bore people and waste electrons with identical comments on multiple stories or repetitive comments that don't advance a conversation.
  • Trolling, sockpuppetry, and other abusive behavior. Please don't feed the trolls and don't pretend to be someone you're not.
  • Gossip. Don't bring up others who can't defend themselves. We don't give out personal information; you shouldn't either.

Comments that violate these guidelines may be removed. We reserve the right to make up the rules as we go along.

Flagging

Commentors are solely responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. Users who violate these standards may lose their privileges on TucsonSentinel.com.

Sentinel editors can't read every comment. Trolls, spammers and other troublemakers can slide under the bridge. We rely on you to help maintain a healthy conversation - more than likely, you're reading these comments before the editors.

What if you see something inappropriate? Use the 'Flag' button to send it to a moderation queue. Help us out and tell us why you're reporting it; please don't report someone just because you disagree with them. Boy who cried wolf and all that. We'll take appropriate action on violations.

We will not edit comments to alter their meaning or censor comments because of political content.

We will not remove comments solely because they are heartless, cruel, coarse, foolish or just plain wrong. Your disapproval can maintain a decent signal to noise ratio. Ultimately, however, self-policing is the best method.

Bottom line, don't be a jerk.

  • A
  • A
  • A
  •   Share:
  • more»
Show previews