Sponsored by

Comments on

Loughner still incompetent for trial, hearing set

A psychologist says accused Jan. 8 gunman Jared Loughner is still incompetent to stand trial. While Loughner's mental state is improving, he should remain in a prison hospital for another four months, she said. His attorneys agreed.... Read more»

have your say   

5 comments on this story

1
1768 comments
Feb 2, 2012, 7:11 pm
-1 +1

Justice delayed…again. Quack Pietz and His Dishonor Burns should both be thoroughly ashamed of themselves for their parts in unnecessarily perpetuating this circus.

How many times are we going to commemorate another January 8 anniversary before this idiot’s trial finally starts?

2
542 comments
Feb 3, 2012, 12:16 am
-0 +0

A comment on this story was removed because, as near as I could tell, it was off-topic.

3
1768 comments
Feb 3, 2012, 9:52 am
-0 +0

I’m gonna throw out a conspiracy theory here…again, just a theory, but it seems to fit…

Though this tragedy happened in Tucson, it has been thrust on the national stage. Also on the national stage was the Casey Anthony trial.

Casey Anthony got a pass on killing her daughter because the idiotic jurors couldn’t tell the difference between doubt and reasonable doubt.

The intention based on what we’ve seen so far from the federal courts is that they intend to give Loughner a pass on his crimes because he’s “crazy”.

My conspiracy theory is that the federal court system knows that the public would be so outraged by seeing two people get a pass for their crimes in a short amount of time. This is why they’re deliberately stalling this idiots trial…they’re waiting for people to forget Casey Anthony before they proceed. Allowing two people passes in such a short amount of time would enrage the public so badly that they might actually do something about it. Space it out long enough between passes…and the public will still be mad, but not mad enough to do anything about it.

4
30 comments
Feb 4, 2012, 8:53 am
-0 +0

Personally,  I am just as emotional over this as any other Tucson native, but if you look at Jared’s psychological track record, he is the very definition of an anti-social, paranoid schizophrenic.  We have an insanity plea for that very reason (in AZ it’s considered “guilty but insane”) - if anyone is deserving of this title, and the legal proceedings afforded to it, I would say it would be him.  Yes, there is evidence that it was premeditated, making it more sticky. And NO, I do not want him to walk free or to get off easy in any way.  Labeling him insane does not remove his guilt, or change what he did.  It does, however, lend a credible hand toward explaining how an individual could commit such a horrific crime.  Jared Loughner is not playing with a full deck of cards; I think we can all agree on that much.

5
1768 comments
Feb 5, 2012, 4:16 am
-0 +0

@justsayin

Loughner probably is not playing with a “full deck of cards”. But, please allow me another card-related analogy…his crime was so horrific, and clearly pre-medidated, that the “crazy” card shouldn’t be allowed to be played. To me it looks as if he’s working the system pretty well. Larry Burns is supposed to be smart enough to know better…I guess the bar for federal judges has been set pretty low or something.

I say it is time for Arizonans again to do the job the feds won’t do. A year and counting, and Loughner’s trial start date is no where in sight. The victims, their families, and this community deserves much better, and it is absolutely inexcusable that justice in this matter has been constantly and unnecessarily delayed. A year is plenty of time to start someone’s, anyone’s, trial.

I call upon the Pima County attorney, or the Arizona Attorney General’s office, to do the job the feds won’t do. Any deference those two offices show the Federal Government is out of courtesy, not obligation. Since that courtesy has not been returned nor appreciated, it is time to take matters in to our own hands. Loughner is caught dead-to-rights for six counts of first-degree murder, 13 counts of attempted murder, and a whole host of lesser charges. I say it is past time to indict at a local level, and finally do the right thing that the feds won’t do.

Sorry, we missed your input...

You must be logged in or register to comment

Categories

news, politics & government, crime & safety, health, local, arizona, breaking
Sponsored by

Top Commenters

  • Bret Linden: 1766
  • Dylan Smith: 540
  • Cactus Dave: 339
  • buddhaboy: 316
  • Roberto De Vido: 270
  • Brittanicus: 176
  • Quietwoman2: 172
  • EllieMae: 151
  • TucsonGirl: 116
  • janamg: 88
Sponsored by

Yes!

I want to help TucsonSentinel.com offer a real news alternative!

We're committed to making quality news accessible; we'll never set up a paywall or charge for our site. But we rely on your support to bring you independent news without the spin. Use our convenient PayPal/credit card donation form below or contact us at donate@tucsonsentinel.com today.

Subscribe and stretch your donation over time:

$10/mo. Printer's Devil
$15/mo. Cub Reporter
$20/mo. Stringer
$40/mo. Correspondent
$50/mo. Senior Correspondent
Enter your own monthly amount (number only)

Or give a secure one-time gift with PayPal or your credit card:

$5,000 Newshound
$2,500 Copy desk chief
$1,000 Trusted source
$500 Correspondent
$250 Stringer
$100 Cub reporter
$50 Printer's Devil
$25 Informed Source
$10 Dear Reader
Enter your own amount (below)

TucsonSentinel.com is an Arizona nonprofit organization fiscally sponsored by FCIR.org, a 501c3 charity. Your contribution is tax-deductible.

User Guidelines

Please be respectful and relevant. Thought-provoking. Or at least funny.

We want comments to advance the discussion and we need your help. Debate, disagree, yell (digitally) or laugh, but do it with respect.

We won't censor your comments if we don't agree with you; we want viewpoints from across the political spectrum. We're dedicated to sparking an open, active discussion. We believe people with differing opinions can spark debate and effect change.

Comments are open to registered users of TucsonSentinel.com.

Keep in mind:

  • A conversation involves sharing and respect. Support your viewpoint with facts, not attacks.
  • Ask questions. Search out answers.
  • Remember that being part of a community requires tolerance for differing views.
  • We can't ensure that all comments are based in truth. The only comments we endorse are those we write ourselves.

TucsonSentinel.com does not allow:

  • Hate speech. Blatantly racist, sexist or homophobic slurs or calls for violence against a particular type of person, etc. will be removed.
  • Obscenity & excessive cursing. Sometimes a well-placed curse word - if you're creative enough to get it past our auto-censor - can express your point in just the right way. But we say '%*$& no' to cursing for cursing's sake. And lose the explicit sexually-descriptive language. It doesn't contribute to the debate and there are plenty of other places on the Internet to find it.
  • Flaming. During a heated discussion, unkind words may be spoken. We can live with a certain amount of rudeness in the name of provocative conversation, but a pattern of personal attacks (name-calling, mocking, or baiting) is not acceptable nor are threatening or harassing comments. Show some respect, please.
  • Explicit political endorsements. As a nonprofit we can't allow electioneering. Analysis and explanation of political issues and candidates are encouraged, but specific calls to vote for or against a measure or politician should be done elsewhere.
  • Spam. Solicitation of products or services isn't allowed; contact us about advertising, we'd love to talk to you. Links to off-topic sites may be deleted.
  • Copyright or IP infringement. Lengthy quotes and violations of 'Fair Use' aren't allowed. Anything you post should be your own work.
  • Overposting. Don't bore people and waste electrons with identical comments on multiple stories or repetitive comments that don't advance a conversation.
  • Trolling, sockpuppetry, and other abusive behavior. Please don't feed the trolls and don't pretend to be someone you're not.
  • Gossip. Don't bring up others who can't defend themselves. We don't give out personal information; you shouldn't either.

Comments that violate these guidelines may be removed. We reserve the right to make up the rules as we go along.

Flagging

Commentors are solely responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. Users who violate these standards may lose their privileges on TucsonSentinel.com.

Sentinel editors can't read every comment. Trolls, spammers and other troublemakers can slide under the bridge. We rely on you to help maintain a healthy conversation - more than likely, you're reading these comments before the editors.

What if you see something inappropriate? Use the 'Flag' button to send it to a moderation queue. Help us out and tell us why you're reporting it; please don't report someone just because you disagree with them. Boy who cried wolf and all that. We'll take appropriate action on violations.

We will not edit comments to alter their meaning or censor comments because of political content.

We will not remove comments solely because they are heartless, cruel, coarse, foolish or just plain wrong. Your disapproval can maintain a decent signal to noise ratio. Ultimately, however, self-policing is the best method.

Bottom line, don't be a jerk.

Sign up for TucsonSentinel.com email newsletters!

find us on facebook
Sponsored by
Sponsored by
Sponsored by