Sponsored by

Comments on

Gannett pulls plug on Tucson Citizen, again

Four and a half years after the press of the Tucson Citizen rolled for the final time, the final employee of what became a blogging site was laid off Friday. Newspaper chain Gannett announced that the website would become an archive, letting go sportswriter Anthony Gimino (for the second time) and shutting down the site.... Read more»

have your say   

7 comments on this story

1
6 comments
Jan 31, 2014, 3:17 pm
-0 +1

I had been waiting for just such an occurrence. I’ve posted over 100 articles on my blog, ReTired Tucson Teacher and dozens more on my Armchair Marcaeologist. It has been a great opportunity and I enjoyed the experience immensely. It is too bad that this type of written interchange is no longer available to our regional readers and the blogging world at large.

2
1767 comments
Jan 31, 2014, 3:39 pm
-5 +2

Good riddance.

I tried blogging there. I stopped partially because I was not comfortable working within the TC’s rules (namely no profanity), but mostly because it was a site for idiots, by idiots. This is in no way a knock on Mark Evans. I found him to be nothing but fair and professional not only with me but with everyone I observed him dealing with.

But, with anyone welcome to blog, and anyone welcome to comment…for the most part, the only people who showed up were left-wing extremists. That made for an atmosphere where a person with a brain-such as myself-felt as if he were beating his head against a wall. So, I gave up.

I thought things were looking up for that place once Evans booted Three Sonorans, but then Mexican-American times popped up, which was the same hate-filled tirades but with a little eye candy. That was the only difference.

TC shutting down is better for everyone as far as I’m concerned.

As to what’s going up in its place…I LOVE the idea. However, why only back to ‘93?

3
116 comments
Feb 1, 2014, 6:52 am
-0 +3

Yeah, the Citizen had some dedicated talented folks hanging around, I’m sure something even better will come along for all of them.

I am REALLY concerned with the archives….I hope someone who appreciates their value, photos and articles, can spirit the stuff to the Historical Society before it gets unceremoniously thrown in a dumpster by some corporate downsizing idiot.

4
1767 comments
Feb 1, 2014, 5:53 pm
-0 +1

I do have an unanswered question about all of this…

For the bloggers, are they going to be granted access to go in and get copies of their blogs, or are they just lost forever unless they saved a copy on their own prior to this?

I’m just curious. Despite my lost interest in the blog, I remained on the mailing list. Based on what I saw there was no advance warning to anyone about this. No one said “we’re gonna pull the plug Friday”, they just did it. While I’m not a fan of many of the bloggers on TC, I have to admit pulling the plug on them with no advance notice was a pretty dick move on the TC’s part.

5
2 comments
Feb 2, 2014, 10:25 pm
-0 +2

The usury of the collection of magnanimous bloggers is beyond egregious. Not all readers found an affinity with the site, but with content and opinion suspended for a moment, they did in fact assist with the sticky wicket compliance issues with the Justice Department compliance adherence for the J.O.A. This is the exact kind of behavior the Pope has referenced in recent encyclicals.
It is duly noted that Gannett is also the owner of Military Times, the publisher of Army, Navy, Marine and Air Force Times. Possibly they will distribute some of their unearned revenues, by bagging 50% of the Arizona Star’s retail ad’s, and tithing to Disabled Veterans

6
1767 comments
Feb 3, 2014, 8:33 am
-0 +1

I have one more thought about this…

Mark Evans stated, correctly in my opinion, that the TC’s only objective was to exist.

I’m not just talking about Tucson, I’m not just talking about a media outlet, I’m not just talking about a website, I’m talking about ANYTHING in life…

If the one and only objective of anything is to merely exist, then that entity doesn’t need to be existing.

7
2 comments
Feb 4, 2014, 1:48 am
-0 +1

Fort Buckley and Fraser007 were hardly left wing. Both erudite and pleasantly conservative.

Sorry, we missed your input...

You must be logged in or register to comment

Click to enlarge

A terse announcement replaced all of the pages of the TucsonCitizen.com site Friday.

Categories

news, business, media & journalism, history, local, arizona, breaking
Sponsored by

Top Commenters

  • Bret Linden: 1765
  • Dylan Smith: 539
  • Cactus Dave: 339
  • buddhaboy: 316
  • Roberto De Vido: 270
  • Brittanicus: 176
  • Quietwoman2: 172
  • EllieMae: 148
  • TucsonGirl: 116
  • janamg: 88
Sponsored by

Yes!

I want to help TucsonSentinel.com offer a real news alternative!

We're committed to making quality news accessible; we'll never set up a paywall or charge for our site. But we rely on your support to bring you independent news without the spin. Use our convenient PayPal/credit card donation form below or contact us at donate@tucsonsentinel.com today.

Subscribe and stretch your donation over time:

$10/mo. Printer's Devil
$15/mo. Cub Reporter
$20/mo. Stringer
$40/mo. Correspondent
$50/mo. Senior Correspondent
Enter your own monthly amount (number only)

Or give a secure one-time gift with PayPal or your credit card:

$5,000 Newshound
$2,500 Copy desk chief
$1,000 Trusted source
$500 Correspondent
$250 Stringer
$100 Cub reporter
$50 Printer's Devil
$25 Informed Source
$10 Dear Reader
Enter your own amount (below)

TucsonSentinel.com is an Arizona nonprofit organization fiscally sponsored by FCIR.org, a 501c3 charity. Your contribution is tax-deductible.

User Guidelines

Please be respectful and relevant. Thought-provoking. Or at least funny.

We want comments to advance the discussion and we need your help. Debate, disagree, yell (digitally) or laugh, but do it with respect.

We won't censor your comments if we don't agree with you; we want viewpoints from across the political spectrum. We're dedicated to sparking an open, active discussion. We believe people with differing opinions can spark debate and effect change.

Comments are open to registered users of TucsonSentinel.com.

Keep in mind:

  • A conversation involves sharing and respect. Support your viewpoint with facts, not attacks.
  • Ask questions. Search out answers.
  • Remember that being part of a community requires tolerance for differing views.
  • We can't ensure that all comments are based in truth. The only comments we endorse are those we write ourselves.

TucsonSentinel.com does not allow:

  • Hate speech. Blatantly racist, sexist or homophobic slurs or calls for violence against a particular type of person, etc. will be removed.
  • Obscenity & excessive cursing. Sometimes a well-placed curse word - if you're creative enough to get it past our auto-censor - can express your point in just the right way. But we say '%*$& no' to cursing for cursing's sake. And lose the explicit sexually-descriptive language. It doesn't contribute to the debate and there are plenty of other places on the Internet to find it.
  • Flaming. During a heated discussion, unkind words may be spoken. We can live with a certain amount of rudeness in the name of provocative conversation, but a pattern of personal attacks (name-calling, mocking, or baiting) is not acceptable nor are threatening or harassing comments. Show some respect, please.
  • Explicit political endorsements. As a nonprofit we can't allow electioneering. Analysis and explanation of political issues and candidates are encouraged, but specific calls to vote for or against a measure or politician should be done elsewhere.
  • Spam. Solicitation of products or services isn't allowed; contact us about advertising, we'd love to talk to you. Links to off-topic sites may be deleted.
  • Copyright or IP infringement. Lengthy quotes and violations of 'Fair Use' aren't allowed. Anything you post should be your own work.
  • Overposting. Don't bore people and waste electrons with identical comments on multiple stories or repetitive comments that don't advance a conversation.
  • Trolling, sockpuppetry, and other abusive behavior. Please don't feed the trolls and don't pretend to be someone you're not.
  • Gossip. Don't bring up others who can't defend themselves. We don't give out personal information; you shouldn't either.

Comments that violate these guidelines may be removed. We reserve the right to make up the rules as we go along.

Flagging

Commentors are solely responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. Users who violate these standards may lose their privileges on TucsonSentinel.com.

Sentinel editors can't read every comment. Trolls, spammers and other troublemakers can slide under the bridge. We rely on you to help maintain a healthy conversation - more than likely, you're reading these comments before the editors.

What if you see something inappropriate? Use the 'Flag' button to send it to a moderation queue. Help us out and tell us why you're reporting it; please don't report someone just because you disagree with them. Boy who cried wolf and all that. We'll take appropriate action on violations.

We will not edit comments to alter their meaning or censor comments because of political content.

We will not remove comments solely because they are heartless, cruel, coarse, foolish or just plain wrong. Your disapproval can maintain a decent signal to noise ratio. Ultimately, however, self-policing is the best method.

Bottom line, don't be a jerk.

Sign up for TucsonSentinel.com email newsletters!

find us on facebook
Sponsored by
Sponsored by
Sponsored by