Sponsored by

Comments on

Giffords to Senate: 'Too many children are dying'

Former U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords had a deliberate message for lawmakers Wednesday. "Too many children are dying. We must do something," she told senators, speaking briefly before her husband, Mark Kelly, testified on gun control. (with video)... Read more»

have your say   

4 comments on this story

Jan 30, 2013, 2:17 pm
-0 +0

“Law-abiding gun owners will not accept blame for the acts of violent or deranged criminals, said the gun industry lobbyist. “Nor do we believe the government should dictate what we can lawfully own and use to protect our families.”

Well said. I wanted to leave a comment of some sort, but I really can’t improve on this closing quote.

Jan 30, 2013, 2:22 pm
-1 +0

I do want to add this…

There is a part of me, a minority part of me, that wants to see all these proposed gun laws pushed through. I want to see Obama get his way and see the Second Amendment repealed. I want to see it be illegal to buy any gun where you can fire more than six shots, and you cant take that gun anywhere except in your home and out of the wilderness…

The reason a part of me wants to see this so we can let a decade or so go by, and then by that time perhaps people at large then would be able to see that all these gun laws didn’t do a damn bit of good, and didn’t reduce gun violence one bit. Then, perhaps at that time, sanity would return, we would restore the Second Amendment, and with any luck the hysteria wouldn’t be brought up again, at least in my lifetime.

Jan 30, 2013, 2:51 pm
-0 +0

@Bret Linden

We think it’s reasonable to provide mandatory instant criminal background checks for every sale at every gun show. No loopholes anywhere for anyone.

NRA chief Wayne LaPierre, 1999

LaPierre testified today that the NRA now opposes such checks.

Jan 30, 2013, 3:06 pm
-0 +0

@Dylan Smith

Well, I do, too. Well, for private party sales. If I own something, I don’t want the government telling me that I can’t sell it and I’m stuck with it until Kozachik comes up with another idiotic gun buyback where I can get a Safeway gift card for it…

So LaPierre changed his mind, and he thought better of his previous position. Haven’t we all done that? I myself have done that on some issues. Obama’s done that many times on many issues, but when he does it its called “evolving”.

Personally, I would be OK with background checks for private party sales/gun shows if there were some sort of easy, simple, red-tape-free way for the seller to quickly check on the potential buyer. But, I know that would never be available. Even though we now live in a world with the internet, there are far too many forces that somehow believe that public records are confidential.

Sorry, we missed your input...

You must be logged in or register to comment

Click to enlarge

Mary Shinn/Cronkite News Service

Former Rep. Gabrielle Giffords was severely injured in the Jan. 8 shooting spree in Tucson that killed six people and wounded 12 others. Giffords made a surprise appearance with her husband, Mark Kelly, at a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing considering gun-violence measures.


news, politics & government, crime & safety, family/life, health, local, arizona, nation/world, breaking
Sponsored by

Top Commenters

  • Bret Linden: 1766
  • Dylan Smith: 540
  • Cactus Dave: 339
  • buddhaboy: 316
  • Roberto De Vido: 270
  • Brittanicus: 176
  • Quietwoman2: 172
  • EllieMae: 152
  • TucsonGirl: 116
  • janamg: 88
Sponsored by


I want to help TucsonSentinel.com offer a real news alternative!

We're committed to making quality news accessible; we'll never set up a paywall or charge for our site. But we rely on your support to bring you independent news without the spin. Use our convenient PayPal/credit card donation form below or contact us at donate@tucsonsentinel.com today.

Subscribe and stretch your donation over time:

$10/mo. Printer's Devil
$15/mo. Cub Reporter
$20/mo. Stringer
$40/mo. Correspondent
$50/mo. Senior Correspondent
Enter your own monthly amount (number only)

Or give a secure one-time gift with PayPal or your credit card:

$5,000 Newshound
$2,500 Copy desk chief
$1,000 Trusted source
$500 Correspondent
$250 Stringer
$100 Cub reporter
$50 Printer's Devil
$25 Informed Source
$10 Dear Reader
Enter your own amount (below)

TucsonSentinel.com is an Arizona nonprofit organization fiscally sponsored by FCIR.org, a 501c3 charity. Your contribution is tax-deductible.

User Guidelines

Please be respectful and relevant. Thought-provoking. Or at least funny.

We want comments to advance the discussion and we need your help. Debate, disagree, yell (digitally) or laugh, but do it with respect.

We won't censor your comments if we don't agree with you; we want viewpoints from across the political spectrum. We're dedicated to sparking an open, active discussion. We believe people with differing opinions can spark debate and effect change.

Comments are open to registered users of TucsonSentinel.com.

Keep in mind:

  • A conversation involves sharing and respect. Support your viewpoint with facts, not attacks.
  • Ask questions. Search out answers.
  • Remember that being part of a community requires tolerance for differing views.
  • We can't ensure that all comments are based in truth. The only comments we endorse are those we write ourselves.

TucsonSentinel.com does not allow:

  • Hate speech. Blatantly racist, sexist or homophobic slurs or calls for violence against a particular type of person, etc. will be removed.
  • Obscenity & excessive cursing. Sometimes a well-placed curse word - if you're creative enough to get it past our auto-censor - can express your point in just the right way. But we say '%*$& no' to cursing for cursing's sake. And lose the explicit sexually-descriptive language. It doesn't contribute to the debate and there are plenty of other places on the Internet to find it.
  • Flaming. During a heated discussion, unkind words may be spoken. We can live with a certain amount of rudeness in the name of provocative conversation, but a pattern of personal attacks (name-calling, mocking, or baiting) is not acceptable nor are threatening or harassing comments. Show some respect, please.
  • Explicit political endorsements. As a nonprofit we can't allow electioneering. Analysis and explanation of political issues and candidates are encouraged, but specific calls to vote for or against a measure or politician should be done elsewhere.
  • Spam. Solicitation of products or services isn't allowed; contact us about advertising, we'd love to talk to you. Links to off-topic sites may be deleted.
  • Copyright or IP infringement. Lengthy quotes and violations of 'Fair Use' aren't allowed. Anything you post should be your own work.
  • Overposting. Don't bore people and waste electrons with identical comments on multiple stories or repetitive comments that don't advance a conversation.
  • Trolling, sockpuppetry, and other abusive behavior. Please don't feed the trolls and don't pretend to be someone you're not.
  • Gossip. Don't bring up others who can't defend themselves. We don't give out personal information; you shouldn't either.

Comments that violate these guidelines may be removed. We reserve the right to make up the rules as we go along.


Commentors are solely responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. Users who violate these standards may lose their privileges on TucsonSentinel.com.

Sentinel editors can't read every comment. Trolls, spammers and other troublemakers can slide under the bridge. We rely on you to help maintain a healthy conversation - more than likely, you're reading these comments before the editors.

What if you see something inappropriate? Use the 'Flag' button to send it to a moderation queue. Help us out and tell us why you're reporting it; please don't report someone just because you disagree with them. Boy who cried wolf and all that. We'll take appropriate action on violations.

We will not edit comments to alter their meaning or censor comments because of political content.

We will not remove comments solely because they are heartless, cruel, coarse, foolish or just plain wrong. Your disapproval can maintain a decent signal to noise ratio. Ultimately, however, self-policing is the best method.

Bottom line, don't be a jerk.

Sign up for TucsonSentinel.com email newsletters!

find us on facebook
Sponsored by
Sponsored by
Sponsored by