Sponsored by

Comments on

Casinos muscle in on 'Five C’s' of Az economy

The “Five C’s” that traditionally made the bulk of Arizona’s economy – copper, climate, cattle, cotton, citrus – may need to make room for a sixth: casinos. Revenue from Arizona’s 22 casinos far surpassed cattle, cotton and citrus in the most recent figures available.... Read more»

have your say   

1 comment on this story

1
604 comments
Dec 15, 2011, 9:44 am
-0 +0

“My sense is that most (gaming money) is spent by residents, so this is just a churn of local dollars,” Hoffman wrote in an e-mail. “A dollar spent on gaming means one less dollar spent on some other local activity.

“Indeed, cattle, cotton and citrus aren’t as significant in the state today, but touting gaming as key to economic prosperity using these numbers is a stretch,” he wrote.

This is what I was thinking when I read the story. I was going to comment saying something to this effect, but this Hoffman guy beat me to it.

I personally have no problem with casinos being here. I support them, in fact. The Pasqua-Yaqui nation has made the most of these opportunities. I spent part of my time growing up very close to their nation (pre-casino), and when I go there now…I can see a BIG difference, and for the better. Better roads, a medical clinic, a library, a couple of parks…and off the res, the wall of the Circle K is no longer lined with bums begging for change to buy a 40 oz of some horrible beer. The quality of life has definitely increased over there, and it’s because of the prosperity gaming has brought their nation. Even the casino itself is very nice, and AVA is a great venue that has brought acts to town that we would have had to otherwise go to Phoenix to see.

I guess my point is that you really can’t consider gaming a boon or bust for the state’s economy, but it has most definitely improved the economies of the Native American nations…without them having to rely on federal dollars.

Sorry, we missed your input...

You must be logged in or register to comment

Click to enlarge

Joshua Armstrong/Cronkite News Service

Casinos raked in $1.7 billion in fiscal 2011, putting them well ahead of receipts for cattle, cotton and citrus – three of the Five C’s, with copper and climate, that were recognized as traditional drivers of the Arizona economy.

Categories

news, politics & government, business, local, arizona, entertainment, celebs/pop culture, breaking, Cronkite News Service
Sponsored by

Top Commenters

  • Bret Linden: 604
  • Dylan Smith: 246
  • Roberto De Vido: 241
  • buddhaboy: 202
  • Quietwoman2: 172
  • Brittanicus: 141
  • Joan: 83
  • scar: 80
  • azjimn2son: 63
  • tiponeill: 38
Sponsored by

User Guidelines

Please be respectful and relevant. Thought-provoking. Or at least funny.

We want comments to advance the discussion and we need your help. Debate, disagree, yell (digitally) or laugh, but do it with respect.

We won't censor your comments if we don't agree with you; we want viewpoints from across the political spectrum. We're dedicated to sparking an open, active discussion. We believe people with differing opinions can spark debate and effect change.

Comments are open to registered users of TucsonSentinel.com.

Keep in mind:

  • A conversation involves sharing and respect. Support your viewpoint with facts, not attacks.
  • Ask questions. Search out answers.
  • Remember that being part of a community requires tolerance for differing views.
  • We can't ensure that all comments are based in truth. The only comments we endorse are those we write ourselves.

TucsonSentinel.com does not allow:

  • Hate speech. Blatantly racist, sexist or homophobic slurs or calls for violence against a particular type of person, etc. will be removed.
  • Obscenity & excessive cursing. Sometimes a well-placed curse word - if you're creative enough to get it past our auto-censor - can express your point in just the right way. But we say '%*$& no' to cursing for cursing's sake. And lose the explicit sexually-descriptive language. It doesn't contribute to the debate and there are plenty of other places on the Internet to find it.
  • Flaming. During a heated discussion, unkind words may be spoken. We can live with a certain amount of rudeness in the name of provocative conversation, but a pattern of personal attacks (name-calling, mocking, or baiting) is not acceptable nor are threatening or harassing comments. Show some respect, please.
  • Spam. Solicitation of products or services isn't allowed; contact us about advertising, we'd love to talk to you. Links to off-topic sites may be deleted.
  • Copyright or IP infringement. Lengthy quotes and violations of 'Fair Use' aren't allowed. Anything you post should be your own work.
  • Overposting. Don't bore people and waste electrons with identical comments on multiple stories or repetitive comments that don't advance a conversation.
  • Trolling, sockpuppetry, and other abusive behavior. Please don't feed the trolls and don't pretend to be someone you're not.
  • Gossip. Don't bring up others who can't defend themselves. We don't give out personal information; you shouldn't either.

Comments that violate these guidelines may be removed. We reserve the right to make up the rules as we go along.

Flagging

Commentors are solely responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. Users who violate these standards may lose their privileges on TucsonSentinel.com.

Sentinel editors can't read every comment. Trolls, spammers and other troublemakers can slide under the bridge. We rely on you to help maintain a healthy conversation - more than likely, you're reading these comments before the editors.

What if you see something inappropriate? Use the 'Flag' button to send it to a moderation queue. Help us out and tell us why you're reporting it; please don't report someone just because you disagree with them. Boy who cried wolf and all that. We'll take appropriate action on violations.

We will not edit comments to alter their meaning or censor comments because of political content.

We will not remove comments solely because they are heartless, cruel, coarse, foolish or just plain wrong. Your disapproval can maintain a decent signal to noise ratio. Ultimately, however, self-policing is the best method.

Bottom line, don't be a jerk.

  • A
  • A
  • A
  •   Share:
  • more»
Show previews